Rated Care Homes

Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 151 of 181

    rated care homes in Somerset are rated Good, like this one.

Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home: inspection record

Care home, 7 beds, Somerset

Rated Good in May 2026.

Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Gillingham Grange Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Eleighwater House Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Sunnyside Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Sunnymeade Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Oak Lodge Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Somerset

See all care homes in Chard

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 May 2026 (assessment visit 25 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home provides accommodation with personal care and support to up to 7 older people. At the time of this assessment there were 4 people living at the home. At our last comprehensive assessment, published 10 January 2020, we rated this service as good. The service has remained rated as good.We carried out this unannounced comprehensive assessment between 21 April 2026 and 7 May 2026. We visited the home on 28 April 2026.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Yew Tree Cottage was found to be a good service where people received safe and effective care. People told us they felt safe and well supported by staff, and we observed warm, kind and respectful interactions throughout the home.

The environment was clean, well maintained and welcoming, including the garden, which people spoke positively about. Risks were well managed, staff understood safeguarding processes and there was a clear learning culture when incidents occurred. Staffing levels were appropriate to meet people’s needs and staff were well trained, supported and knowledgeable about the people they cared for. Minor improvements were identified in relation to recruitment record-keeping and medicines management, including cold storage arrangements and dating of some medicines, which managers acknowledged and took action to address. People’s needs were assessed before they moved into the home. Care plans were personalised, regularly reviewed and reflected people’s preferences and routines. Staff knew people very well and supported them to maintain their independence and make choices wherever possible, including choosing how to spend their day, when to get up or go to bed, and being involved in decisions about their care.

People and relatives were positive about the quality of care, describing staff as kind, patient and attentive, and said they would feel confident raising concerns if needed. Staff worked closely with health and social care professionals to ensure continuity of care.

Leadership and governance arrangements were effective, with an open and inclusive culture where people, relatives and staff felt listened to and valued. The culture was one of compassion, teamwork and continuous improvement.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect..At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted good-quality care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sarah-Jane Ambridge
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 24 February 2021. Latest assessment published 20 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06203744 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home.
When was Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home was published on 20 May 2026.
Who runs Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home?
Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home is run by Ambridge Estates Limited.
What is Yew Tree Cottage Residential Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
0146064735
Address
Hornsbury Hill, Chard, TA20 3DB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Gillingham Grange Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Eleighwater House Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Sunnyside Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  4. G
    Sunnymeade Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Oak Lodge Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Somerset

See all care homes in Chard