Rated Care Homes

Lynden Hill Clinic

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 3 of 41

    rated care homes in Wokingham are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Lynden Hill Clinic: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 28 beds, Wokingham

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025, down from Good.

Lynden Hill Clinic: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hilltop House (Good, 1.8 miles away) and The Riders (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Hilltop House Good, 1.8 miles away
  2. G
    The Riders Good, 2.1 miles away
  3. G
    Lashbrook House Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bridge House Nursing Home Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Cherry Garden Good, 2.4 miles away

See all care homes in Wokingham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 June 2025 (assessment visit 19 March 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 26 March to 2 April 2025. The service is a care home with nursing providing support to older people, younger adults and people with physical disabilities. The service provides short stays for respite, rehabilitation, therapies and nursing care.This assessment took place due to concerns received about people’s safety, care, risks and governance oversight at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to safeguarding, staff recruitment, notification of reportable events and good governance. The provider and the registered manager did not demonstrate they had robust quality assurance systems and governance processes which operated across all levels of the service.. The registered manager did not ensure there was a good learning culture. People could raise concerns or complaints, however these were not always encouraged, listened to or relevant action taken in line with the provider’s policy and procedures. People were not always protected and kept safe. The registered manager did not ensure safeguarding procedures were followed and any allegations or incidents were reported to external agencies accordingly. The registered manager did not ensure they and the staff team consistently understood and managed risks to people’s health and welfare or that staff received consistent training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. The registered manager did not always ensure there were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience as they did not have oversight of staff’s training and support needs. Effective recruitment processes were not in place to ensure, as far as possible, that people were protected from unsuitable persons being employed. Management of medicines and premises was not always safe and not supported with consistent clear records. Staff did not always work well in partnership with other agencies such as GPs, pharmacies and other clinicians to promote and achieve positive outcomes for people. People and staff were not always encouraged to be actively involved in the development and continuous improvement of the service. CCTV was in use at the exterior entrance and communal areas but without an impact assessment on people’s privacy or clear policy on how to manage it.

Staff ensured people were protected from the risk of acquiring an infection during the provision of their care. The facilities and equipment were clean and well-maintained for infection risks to be mitigated. Staff supported people to access physiotherapy and worked well towards rehabilitation goals to improve mobility and confidence.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed. The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safeguarding and staff recruitment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to oversight and management of the service and governance, and failure to report notifiable events to CQC.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 12 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 12 June 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 12 June 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 12 June 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Anne Ikin
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing, Rehabilitation services
Who it supports
Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 18 September 2020. Latest assessment published 12 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02841841 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Wokingham Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Lynden Hill Clinic provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Lynden Hill Clinic as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Lynden Hill Clinic have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 28 beds at Lynden Hill Clinic.
When was Lynden Hill Clinic last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Lynden Hill Clinic was published on 12 June 2025.
Who runs Lynden Hill Clinic?
Lynden Hill Clinic is run by Lynden Hill Clinics Limited.
What is Lynden Hill Clinic's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 12 June 2025.

Contact

Address
Linden Hill Lane, Kiln Green, Reading, RG10 9XP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hilltop House (Good, 1.8 miles away) and The Riders (Good, 2.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Hilltop House Good, 1.8 miles away
  2. G
    The Riders Good, 2.1 miles away
  3. G
    Lashbrook House Care Home Good, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Bridge House Nursing Home Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Cherry Garden Good, 2.4 miles away

See all care homes in Wokingham