Rated Care Homes

Symonds House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Inadequate in 2015, most recently Good in February 2026.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 102 of 121

    rated care homes in Cambridgeshire are rated Good, like this one.

Symonds House: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 58 beds, Cambridgeshire

Rated Good in February 2026.

Symonds House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Yew Tree Cottage Good, 4 miles away
  2. G
    Churchfield Avenue Good, 4.8 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Hatherley Care Home Limited Good, 5.3 miles away
  5. –
    Bailey Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 5.4 miles away

See all care homes in Cambridgeshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 4 February 2026 (assessment visit 2 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Symonds House is a residential care service that provides accommodation, nursing and personal care for up to 58 people. At the time of our inspection there were 32 people living at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out this inspection to follow up on concerns. This was prompted by a high number of complaints and the significant time that has passed since our last rated inspection in 2017.

At our last inspection the service was rated good.

The assessment was unannounced and was carried out by 3 inspectors, and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

The assessment started on 16 September 2025 and ended on 14 October 2025. We gathered information from people who used the service, family members, the registered manager and care staff working at the service. We undertook a comprehensive assessment looking at all the quality statements.

During the inspection, we spoke with 11 people who use the service, 15 family members, the registered manager, deputy manager, the provider and 8 members of staff.

We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. We reviewed a range of records. This included people’s care and medicine records. We looked at staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service were reviewed.

However, the governance at the service needed some improvement as the issues we found had not been identified during their own auditing processes. For example, records relating to accidents and incidents not being reported. Additional information was required to ensure that risks to people had been fully assessed and mitigated.

Staff protected people’s dignity and privacy and showed compassion and kindness when supporting them in all aspects of their care.

Management and staff had a shared vision. There was a culture of continued improvement. Staff were encouraged to try new ideas.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. Whilst there was no harm noted to people, there was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 4 February 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Angelica Ibayan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

13 inspection reports, latest 27 February 2021. Latest assessment published 4 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04862539 (opens Companies House)

Raveedha Care Limited runs 2 services, all in the East of England. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Raveedha Care Limited

  1. RI
    Eastcotts Care Home with Nursing Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Suffolk

Getting help from Cambridgeshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Symonds House provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Symonds House as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Symonds House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 58 beds at Symonds House.
When was Symonds House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Symonds House was published on 4 February 2026.
Who runs Symonds House?
Symonds House is run by Raveedha Care Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the East of England.
What is Symonds House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 4 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
01223 891237
Address
44 Symonds Lane, Linton, Cambridge, CB21 4HY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Yew Tree Cottage Good, 4 miles away
  2. G
    Churchfield Avenue Good, 4.8 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Hatherley Care Home Limited Good, 5.3 miles away
  5. –
    Bailey Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 5.4 miles away

See all care homes in Cambridgeshire