Rated Care Homes

The Firs

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 295 of 361

    rated care homes in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

The Firs: inspection record

Care home, 11 beds, Essex

Rated Good in September 2026.

The Firs: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Peter House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Beaumont Manor Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Ducks Halt Good, 1.3 miles away
  4. RI
    Winchester House Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Mid Meadows Good, 2.1 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Kirby Cross

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 September 2026 (assessment visit 16 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The service is a residential care home. There were 11 people using the service at the time of the assessment.

This is a specialist service for people with a learning disability and or autistic people. Support is also provided to people with a physical disability, sensory impairment, and those living with other health conditions.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out this assessment on 6 August to 14 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good in February 2018. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We have assessed the service against The Care Quality Commission’s ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance, which was developed to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was meeting these aims.

The Firs is a small, family run service in a homely environment. Some people had lived there for many years, whereas others had more recently moved in. There was a main house, as well as a smaller attached bungalow and central courtyard. The site included an activity centre, with a spa pool and sensory garden. There were also animals including goats, chickens and tropical birds on the grounds of the care home for people to access. A staff member said, “[Person] loves to feed the goats.” Whilst some areas required decorative repair and maintenance, the provider confirmed they had continued plans to invest in the premises going forwards and ongoingly.

The Firs had 2 registered managers in post, with 1 who was also the owner and a company director. We received consistently positive feedback about leaders. When asked about the service, 1 staff member told us, “The best thing is the support that we get from the management and the team, and it being like a little family.” Another staff member told us, “There is really good teamwork. I’ve felt so welcome right from the word go, if I had a problem I could easily talk to the management.”

Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to support people safely. People received their medicines safely and as prescribed. Accidents, incidents and safeguarding matters were dealt with correctly and lessons learned were acted on to mitigate future risk.

People were treated as individuals and support staff showed genuine warmth, compassion and care. A professional who worked with the service told us, “It is lovely to visit a home which has a genuine interest in the wellbeing of the service users and is looking to improve the service as much as they can.” Another professional said, “[The Firs] work very collaboratively with our team, the wider team and are very inclusive and respectful of parents and carers.”

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. A professional who worked with the service said, “I believe [staff member] truly gives the service users at The Firs an amazing quality of life and ensures to act in their best interests at all times. As do all the other staff members that we meet from The Firs.”

Audits were in place to check the safety and quality of the service. However, some health and safety checks had not identified issues. We raised this with the management team who took action straight away. Leaders were in the process of introducing new governance and oversight systems, to positive effect. A professional who worked with the service told us, “The service has demonstrated a positive commitment to staff development and quality improvement.” Another professional said, “[Registered Manager] is very organised and actions my recommendations and will call for advice if needed also.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sanaz Kadar
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 16 February 2018. Latest assessment published 1 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05730805 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Firs provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Firs as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Firs have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 11 beds at The Firs.
When was The Firs last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Firs was published on 1 September 2026.
Who runs The Firs?
The Firs is run by The Firs Care Services Limited.
What is The Firs's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01255 862617
Address
Thorpe Road, Kirby Cross, Frinton On Sea, CO13 0NJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Peter House Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  2. RI
    Beaumont Manor Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Ducks Halt Good, 1.3 miles away
  4. RI
    Winchester House Requires improvement, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Mid Meadows Good, 2.1 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Kirby Cross