Rated Care Homes

Sowerby House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 8 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 10 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 149 of 181

    rated care homes in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Sowerby House: inspection record

Care home, 51 beds, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in December 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Sowerby House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Ruby Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    Hambleton Grange Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Northfield House Good, 4.6 miles away
  4. G
    Valley Road - Resource Centre Good, 8.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Southwoods Nursing Home Requires improvement, 8.6 miles away

See all care homes in North Yorkshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 3 December 2025 (assessment visit 3 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Sowerby House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care. We conducted assessment activity between 2 October 2025 and 4 November 2005, including visits to the service on 2 and 8 October. The assessment was conducted to check the service had made required improvements following our last assessment in 2024. At the last assessment the provider was in breach of legal requirements relating to governance, risk management, infection prevention and control, medicines, consent and person centred care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At this assessment we found the provider had made improvements and was no longer in breach of legal requirements. The provider was now managing risk effectively and the home was clean and generally well maintained. Care plans were more comprehensive. People received person-centred care, in line with their needs and preferences. The team worked in partnership well with other health professionals. Staff worked in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act and respected people’s choices and decisions. Staff were safely recruited, and received appropriate training and supervision. Staff were motivated and felt well supported by the registered manager.

Improvements had been made to medicines management, but further improvements were still needed to medicine records. Governance systems and audits were also more effective. However, there were still some occasions where aspects of care plans needed to be updated more consistently, and examples where care monitoring records needed to be completed more accurately, such as nutrition records. The provider responded promptly to our feedback.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Marie Adams
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 28 September 2022. Latest assessment published 3 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Ultimate Care LimitedBrand: We Care Group
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05893709 (opens Companies House)

Ultimate Care Limited runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Ultimate Care Limited

  1. RI
    Barton Brook Care Home Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, Salford, North West
  2. RI
    Bilton Hall Nursing Home Requires improvement. Care home with nursing, North Yorkshire
  3. RI
    Saltshouse Haven Care Home Requires improvement. Care home, Hull

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Sowerby House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Sowerby House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Sowerby House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 51 beds at Sowerby House.
When was Sowerby House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sowerby House was published on 3 December 2025.
Who runs Sowerby House?
Sowerby House is run by Ultimate Care Limited. It runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Sowerby House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 3 December 2025.

Contact

Phone
01845 525986
Address
Front Street, Sowerby, Thirsk, YO7 1JP Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Ruby Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    Hambleton Grange Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. G
    Northfield House Good, 4.6 miles away
  4. G
    Valley Road - Resource Centre Good, 8.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Southwoods Nursing Home Requires improvement, 8.6 miles away

See all care homes in North Yorkshire