Rated Care Homes

Thorncliffe House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Inadequate in 2015, most recently Good in October 2026.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 73 of 86

    rated care homes in Sunderland are rated Good, like this one.

Thorncliffe House: inspection record

Care home, 24 beds, Sunderland

Rated Good in October 2026.

Thorncliffe House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    14 Thornhill Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Thornhill Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    No 9 Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Thorndale Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Rosehill Good, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Sunderland

See all care homes in Central Sunderland

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 October 2026 (assessment visit 29 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out this assessment on 9 September 2026. The service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider deployed enough skilled and knowledgeable staff to meet people’s needs safely. Risks were assessed and people were involved in the process. There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse. A staff member told us, “Staffing levels are always more than sufficient, there’s always plenty staff on shift and management also support the floor.”

Medicines were administered safely and there were systems to ensure the environment was safe.

People received effective care, tailored to their individual needs and preferences. Their health and communication needs were reflected in assessments and care records. Staff worked with healthcare professionals to promote wellbeing and respond to changes in health.

People were treated with kindness, compassion and respect. There were warm, friendly and relaxed interactions between people and staff. Staff took time to listen, offered people meaningful choices and supported them to express their wishes and preferences about their everyday lives. One staff member said, “People’s voices and choices matter and we will always support that.”

Support was personalised around what mattered to people and how they wanted to spend their time. A range of activities were available 5 days a week, including drawing and gardening. People were supported to access the community using the community car. Weekends often provided opportunities for people to spend time and go out with their families. Monthly activity meetings gave people the opportunity to share their ideas and choose what they would like to do, helping to shape activities around their interests and preferences.

The service was well-led, with leaders who knew their staff well and were focused on getting the best from them. Staff were empowered through learning and development, including train-the-trainer opportunities, champion roles and learning that was shared through supervision. Staff took on champion roles in areas such as medicines, falls, oral health and skin integrity, helping to build knowledge and good practice across the team. Leaders supported staff through regular, meaningful supervision. They were flexible when staff members personal circumstances or health needs changed, considering reasonable adjustments and alternative or dual roles within the home. This created a supportive culture where staff were encouraged to develop their skills, share learning and contribute to providing good quality care.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and authorised. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions and had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Colleen Purvis
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 27 November 2020. Latest assessment published 6 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06388987 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sunderland City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Thorncliffe House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Thorncliffe House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Thorncliffe House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 24 beds at Thorncliffe House.
When was Thorncliffe House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Thorncliffe House was published on 6 October 2026.
Who runs Thorncliffe House?
Thorncliffe House is run by Thorncliffe Care Limited.
What is Thorncliffe House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 October 2026.

Contact

Address
Thorncliffe, 15 Thornhill Park, Sunderland, SR2 7LA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    14 Thornhill Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Thornhill Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    No 9 Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    Thorndale Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  5. G
    Rosehill Good, 0.1 miles away

See all care homes in Sunderland

See all care homes in Central Sunderland