Rated Care Homes

Oxenford House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 85 of 111

    rated care homes in Oxfordshire are rated Good, like this one.

Oxenford House: inspection record

Care home, 25 beds, Oxfordshire

Rated Good in October 2026.

Oxenford House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Chawley Grove Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Shrublands Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Cumnor Hill House Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. –
    Oaken Holt Nursing and Residential Home Not yet rated, 1.7 miles away
  5. –
    Wytham House Not yet rated, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Chawley

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 October 2026 (assessment visit 13 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 27 July 2026 to 19 August 2026.

Oxenford House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for older people, including people living with dementia. At the time of our assessment, 22 people were living at the service and receiving a regulated activity.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Oxenford House provided highly personalised care within a warm, inclusive and person-centred culture. People, relatives, staff and professionals consistently described positive experiences of the service and spoke positively about the caring and supportive environment created by the management team and staff.

People received care that reflected their individual needs, preferences, life histories and aspirations. Staff knew people well and adapted support to help them achieve outcomes that mattered to them.

Staff worked with healthcare professionals and community services to ensure people received coordinated and responsive care. People benefited from timely access to healthcare support, regular monitoring of their wellbeing and prompt responses when needs changed. Relatives described improvements in their family members' health, wellbeing and quality of life following admission to the service.

The provider promoted independence, choice and inclusion. People were supported to remain connected to their local communities, take part in meaningful activities and maintain relationships, interests and cultural or spiritual practices that were important to them. Community engagement and partnership working were notable strengths of the service.

People consistently told us they felt safe, and there was a positive culture of openness, learning and continuous improvement. Staff understood their responsibilities for safeguarding people and demonstrated a commitment to delivering safe, compassionate care.

Leadership was visible, approachable and well respected. Staff felt valued and supported and were encouraged to contribute ideas and develop their skills. Effective governance systems enabled leaders to monitor quality, respond to feedback and drive continuous improvement.

Throughout the assessment, we saw evidence of positive outcomes for people and a clear commitment to providing high-quality, person-centred care. People benefited from support that promoted dignity, independence, wellbeing and quality of life.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained as good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has remained outstanding.

    This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Susan Stubberfield
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 13 May 2021. Latest assessment published 16 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Oxenford House Care Home LimitedBrand: Abbeyfield Society
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP24552R (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Oxenford House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Oxenford House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Oxenford House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 25 beds at Oxenford House.
When was Oxenford House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Oxenford House was published on 16 October 2026.
Who runs Oxenford House?
Oxenford House is run by Oxenford House Care Home Limited.
What is Oxenford House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01865 865116
Address
The Glebe, Cumnor, Oxford, OX2 9RL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Chawley Grove Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    Shrublands Good, 0.9 miles away
  3. G
    Cumnor Hill House Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. –
    Oaken Holt Nursing and Residential Home Not yet rated, 1.7 miles away
  5. –
    Wytham House Not yet rated, 1.7 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Chawley