Rated Care Homes

Kitwood House Care Residence

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 18 of 69

    rated care homes in Cheshire West and Chester are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Kitwood House Care Residence: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 72 beds, Cheshire West and Chester

Rated Requires improvement in June 2025, down from Good.

Kitwood House Care Residence: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Crossways Residential Care Home (Good, 1.1 miles away) and Acorn Hollow General Nursing Home (Good, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Crossways Residential Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  2. G
    Acorn Hollow General Nursing Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  3. G
    Acorn Meadow Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Daneside Court Nursing Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Daneside Mews Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Cheshire West and Chester

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 June 2025 (assessment visit 10 January 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: Onsite 4 and 6 February 2025. Further information was reviewed remotely. Kitwood House Care Residence is a residential care home, providing personal and nursing care. The service can support up to 68 people across 4 units and specialises in providing care to people living with dementia. We undertook this assessment following concerns about poor care reported to the CQC At this assessment, the provider was found to be in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment, consent to care and good governance. The provider did not adhere to the principles of the Mental Capacity Act. There was no evidence practical steps had been taken to support people in making decisions.Care plans were detailed, however for some people who had a deteriorating health condition there was not always guidance for staff on how best to provide support including the management of pain relief and symptoms to be aware of to recognise if the condition is deteriorating. Medicines were not always safely managed. For medicines that were given ‘when required’, protocols in place were not detailed, to advise staff on how much medication to administer and when. When people were assessed as requiring their medicines to be given covertly for example, in food or drink, the GP had been consulted however advice from a pharmacist was not obtained. Obtaining pharmacy advice is important as some medicines can become ineffective when mixed with certain food or drinks. This placed people at risk of not receiving their medication correctly and appropriately. Staff told us there were not enough staff to meet people’s needs. When a person required the use of restraint to protect their well-being and safety, there was not always a debrief. A debrief is important for peoples emotional and psychological wellbeing and to allow for learning and reflection. We observed positive interactions between staff and people who lived in the home. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective No rating
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and protected from avoidable harm. The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to safe care and treatment.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good at this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent. The provider was in breach of regulation in relation to consent to care.

  3. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment we did not assess all quality statements to change the rating.

  4. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good at this inspection the rating has changed to requires improvement. The provider was in breach of legal regulation 17 in relation to the governance of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 26 June 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 26 June 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Victoria Barker
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 3 March 2023. Latest assessment published 26 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
12009015 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Cheshire West and Chester Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Kitwood House Care Residence provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Kitwood House Care Residence as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Kitwood House Care Residence have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 72 beds at Kitwood House Care Residence.
When was Kitwood House Care Residence last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kitwood House Care Residence was published on 26 June 2025.
Who runs Kitwood House Care Residence?
Kitwood House Care Residence is run by London and Manchester Healthcare (Rudheath) Ltd.
What is Kitwood House Care Residence's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 26 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
01606 653555
Address
162 Middlewich Road, Rudheath, Northwich, CW9 7DX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Crossways Residential Care Home (Good, 1.1 miles away) and Acorn Hollow General Nursing Home (Good, 1.2 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Crossways Residential Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  2. G
    Acorn Hollow General Nursing Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  3. G
    Acorn Meadow Good, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Daneside Court Nursing Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Daneside Mews Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Cheshire West and Chester