Rated Care Homes

Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Outstanding to Requires improvement.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 61 of 381

    rated care homes in Lancashire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Lancashire

Rated Requires improvement in February 2023, down from Outstanding.

Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Holme Manor Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Hill View Care Home (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Holme Manor Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Hill View Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
    Ash Cottage Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Haslingden Hall and the Lodge Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Danesmoor Residential Care Home Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Rawtenstall

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 15 February 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home (referred to throughout this report as Cherry Tree Lodge) is a care home providing accommodation and personal care up to a maximum of 23 people in 1 adapted building. At the time of our inspection there were 20 people living at the service. Cherry Tree Lodge is also registered to provide personal care and support to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. However, at the time of the inspection Cherry Tree Lodge was not proving this service.

What inspectors found

Various risks including fire and accident and incidents were not always monitored. People were safeguarded from abuse, the systems and processes for this service supported this. Medicines were managed safely. However, training in this area needed to be improved. The environment was clean and tidy, but some infection prevention practices needed improving. People were supported to have regular visitors. Recruitment processes were safe and there was enough staff to safely support people.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; However, the policies and systems in the service did not always support this practice.

People were not always deprived of their liberty in a lawful and safe way. The necessary assessments were not always carried out in line with the mental capacity act. There was a system in place for staff when they commenced their role. However, not all staff had the relevant training such as medication and fire safety training. People's care plans did not always contain accurate information and were found to be conflicting. We made a recommendation about this. People and their relatives spoke highly of the assessment process and felt involved. The environment was accessible and suitable for people's needs.

People and their relatives spoke positively about the staff and the care they received. One person said, "The staff are lovely and caring." We observed encouraging interactions between staff and people during the inspection and we found people were treated with dignity and respect.

People's records and care plans were person centred. End of life discussions were taking place when appropriate and this was documented. People's communication needs were identified, and information was made available to people in an accessible format. A complaints policy and procedure was in place. However, people told us they had no reason to complain and no complaints had been logged. The registered manager was in the process of recruiting an activities coordinator and we observed staff engaging with people during the inspection.

Audits were in place. However, they did not always identify risk and there was little evidence of learning lessons when something goes wrong. There was no evidence of people and their relatives taking part in feedback or satisfaction surveys. Following on from the inspection the registered manager has now

implemented this to ensure people's voices are heard. Staff worked in partnership with various agencies to support people and staff meetings were taking place. Staff and visiting healthcare professionals spoke highly of the registered manager.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 15 February 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 15 February 2023. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 15 February 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Alison Pressler
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 15 February 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01931055 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Lancashire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home.
When was Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home was published on 15 February 2023.
Who runs Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home?
Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home is run by Cherry Tree Lodge Limited.
What is Cherry Tree Lodge Private Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 15 February 2023.

Contact

Phone
01706 221698
Address
226-228 Bury Road, Rawtenstall, Rossendale, BB4 6DJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Holme Manor Care Home (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Hill View Care Home (Good, 0.8 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Holme Manor Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Hill View Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
    Ash Cottage Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away
  4. G
    Haslingden Hall and the Lodge Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. G
    Danesmoor Residential Care Home Good, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Lancashire

See all care homes in Rawtenstall