The Larches - Tiverton
- Care home
- 20 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2010
- Devon, South West
Inadequate
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Requires improvement to Inadequate.
4 months
since the latest rating was published.
2 of 283
rated care homes in Devon are rated Inadequate, like this one.
The Larches - Tiverton: inspection record
Rated Inadequate in June 2026, down from Requires improvement.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Margaret Allen (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Ashdowne Care Centre (Good, 1 mile away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI St George's House Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
- G Margaret Allen Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Ashdowne Care Centre Good, 1 mile away
- G Somerville House Good, 4.2 miles away
- RI Forge House Services Limited Requires improvement, 4.4 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 June 2026 (assessment visit 9 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 18 March 2026 to 10 April 2026. The Larches Tiverton is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 20 older people. The service provides support to people aged 65 and over living with a physical disability or dementia.
- Safe Inadequate
- Effective Inadequate
- Caring No rating
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary
At our last inspection, April 2024, the service was rated overall as requires improvement. At this inspection, the overall rating has changed to inadequate. Our assessment was in response to concerns linked to the provider’s poor recruitment practice and the way the home was run.
During this inspection, we identified 6 breaches of regulation in safe care and treatment, safeguarding, staffing, recruitment, dignity and respect and governance. 5 of these breaches were repeated concerns raised at 3 previous CQC inspections starting in 2023. The provider’s governance arrangements were not adequate in ensuring the health, safety and welfare of people.
Previous improvements had not been sustained. There was a lack of learning from events that had put people and/or staff at risk of harm. Known environmental risks were not addressed including an on-going safety issue with the lift, which was in use. There was one functioning shower room in the home; the bath was not accessible to most people.
Recruitment was unsafe, and the provider’s safeguarding processes were poor. Potentially harmful chemicals were not stored securely, and we had concerns about practices to mitigate infection control risks. Medicines were poorly managed.
Incidents and accidents were not recorded in a way which could be easily audited to find patterns and trends. Known risks to people’s health were not consistently monitored and audits failed to identify contradictory information and gaps in recording.
Care records were variable in quality depending on which staff member had completed them and their own knowledge. Staff were hampered by poor oversight of their training, an unstable staff team, at times a lack of effective management and poor support regarding supervisions and appraisals.
A number of experienced and long standing staff had left in a period of over 4 months, including the previous registered manager and the deputy manager. Staff told us they were unsettled and worried. There had been a period when there was no manager or deputy in post and other staff had been given extra tasks and responsibilities without appropriate support.
However, a new manager had started 3 days before our inspection and staff told us they were approachable and reassuring. The new manager was proactive and had begun to review the service improvement plan and address medicine management. They told us they had submitted their CQC application be assessed for the role of registered manager.
The staff group, including non-care staff were committed and showed a genuine fondness for people living at the service and their families. They wanted to do the best they could and worked well with health professionals. They were attentive and knew the people they supported well. Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) were well-managed. DoLS is a legal protection under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), to protect the rights of people in care homes who lack the capacity to consent to their care arrangements, and who may be deprived of their liberty as a result. Staff had access to the information they needed to ensure they supported people appropriately in line with the MCA.
Information was not provided in an up to date or accessible manner. The provider did not consult with staff about proposed changes. Goods and agency staff had not been supplied due to unpaid bills.
Staff said they were reluctant to raise concerns with the provider. They did not feel confident they would be treated with compassion and understanding, and were worried they would be blamed, or treated negatively if they did so.
The provider’s monthly audits were poorly completed and did not show a progress of actions. They had chosen to also be the nominated individual; a role which includes oversight of the home and the monitoring of standards.
This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.
In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.
-
Safe
Inadequate
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, including medicines and infection control, staffing, recruitment and safeguarding.
-
Effective
Inadequate
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At a previous assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, dignity and respect.
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At a previous assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained the same. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s dignity and respect and good governance.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s dignity and respect and good governance.
-
Well-led
Inadequate
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance of the service.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Inadequate on 17 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Inadequate on 17 June 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 17 June 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 17 June 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 24 August 2023. Latest assessment published 17 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Anne Gray Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04707789 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Devon County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Devon County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 155 1007, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4pm
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does The Larches - Tiverton provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Larches - Tiverton as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does The Larches - Tiverton have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 20 beds at The Larches - Tiverton.
- When was The Larches - Tiverton last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Larches - Tiverton was published on 17 June 2026.
- Who runs The Larches - Tiverton?
- The Larches - Tiverton is run by Anne Gray Care Limited.
- What is The Larches - Tiverton's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 17 June 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01884 257355
- Address
- Canal Hill, Tiverton, EX16 4JD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Margaret Allen (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Ashdowne Care Centre (Good, 1 mile away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI St George's House Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away
- G Margaret Allen Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Ashdowne Care Centre Good, 1 mile away
- G Somerville House Good, 4.2 miles away
- RI Forge House Services Limited Requires improvement, 4.4 miles away