Rated Care Homes

Parkgate Manor

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in September 2025.

  • 13 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 39 of 258

    rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Parkgate Manor: inspection record

Care home, 40 beds, East Sussex

Rated Requires improvement in September 2025.

Parkgate Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Saxonwood (Good, 1.5 miles away) and Edendale Lodge (Good, 2.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Hazel Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    Saxonwood Good, 1.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Cedarwood House Care Home Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Edendale Lodge Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Abbey Lodge Good, 3 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 September 2025 (assessment visit 10 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment was carried out between the 24 June to 15 July 2025. The service was previously rated requires improvement with 3 breaches of legal regulations in December 2022. This assessment was undertaken to follow up on whether these breaches had been met.The service is a residential care home providing support to autistic people and people with a learning disability. The service is registered to accommodate up to 40 people. At the time of our assessment there were 24 people living at the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the last assessment, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to people’s health appointments and some staff practices were institutional. Improvements were found during this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. However, whilst improvements were made in relation to care planning, further oversight is needed to ensure records are continually reviewed and updated as needed.

The provider had also previously been in breach of the legal regulation in relation to concerns identified around some quality assurance processes, a lack of audits in relation to care plans, seeking feedback from people, relatives and staff, supervision of staff and compliance for right support, right care, right culture guidance. The provider has been continuously in breach of regulation in respect of governance since August 2021. Whilst some improvements were made, these were not sustained, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. In addition, we found further shortfalls in relation to infection prevention and control, management of medicines, cleaning schedules and health and safety checks that indicated there was not effective oversight of these areas. The manager confirmed in writing and provided evidence of the actions taken to address the shortfalls. Progress made now needs to be sustained and embedded.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RSRCRC) guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Whilst we found staff were caring, offered people choices, and treated people with dignity, the systems in place did not demonstrate that people’s voice was always heard and acted upon.

The model of care was not in line with current best practice guidance, RSRCRC. The service is larger than best practice guidelines. This was because the service was operating before the guidance was released. The provider was aware of this and although progress was being made to improve outcomes to meet the principles of RSRCRC, further work was needed to demonstrate more clearly how this was being achieved and would be developed further.

There had been no registered manager for 14 months. The managing director had previously been the registered manager and knew people, staff and the service well. (They are referred to throughout this report as the manager.) There had been inconsistent leadership due to a turnover of registered managers. This meant quality assurance and monitoring systems had not been sustained.

We observed that the service provided kind and compassionate care, and staff knew people and their needs well. The provider worked in partnership with external health and social care professionals to ensure good outcomes for people. Professionals spoke highly of staff at Parkgate Manor. Although staff had not received formal supervision, they spoke positively about working at the service and felt well supported.

There were good training opportunities available to staff. All staff had opportunities to attend face to face specialist training to meet the needs of people living at Parkgate Manor. Management at Parkgate Manor knew the service, people, and staff well.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

    At our last assessment, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to people’s health appointments. Improvements were found during this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

    At our last assessment, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to some staff practices that were institutional. Improvements were found during this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

    At our last assessment, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to care planning on the providers new electronic care planning system. Improvements were found during this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment, the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    At our last assessment, the provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to concerns identified around some quality assurance processes, seeking feedback from people, relatives and staff and supervision of staff. Improvements were not found during this assessment and the provider remains in breach of this regulation.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 29 September 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 29 September 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sally Tester
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

12 inspection reports, latest 8 December 2022. Latest assessment published 29 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from East Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Parkgate Manor provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Parkgate Manor as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Parkgate Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 40 beds at Parkgate Manor.
When was Parkgate Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Parkgate Manor was published on 29 September 2025.
Who runs Parkgate Manor?
Parkgate Manor is run by Parkgate Manor.
What is Parkgate Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 29 September 2025.

Contact

Phone
01424 773251
Address
Main Road, Catsfield, Battle, TN33 9DT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Saxonwood (Good, 1.5 miles away) and Edendale Lodge (Good, 2.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Hazel Lodge Care Home Not yet rated, 0.9 miles away
  2. G
    Saxonwood Good, 1.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Cedarwood House Care Home Requires improvement, 2.3 miles away
  4. G
    Edendale Lodge Good, 2.4 miles away
  5. G
    Abbey Lodge Good, 3 miles away

See all care homes in East Sussex