Rated Care Homes

Arliemoor Care Home

I

Inadequate

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 2 of 283

    rated care homes in Devon are rated Inadequate, like this one.

Arliemoor Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Devon

Rated Inadequate in May 2026, down from Good.

Arliemoor Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Roses (Good, 1.7 miles away) and Halwill Manor Nursing Home (Good, 5.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Roses Good, 1.7 miles away
  2. –
    Deer Park Nursing Home Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
  3. RI
    Barn Park Residential Home Requires improvement, 5.1 miles away
  4. G
    Halwill Manor Nursing Home Good, 5.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Southlands Court Residential Home Requires improvement, 5.7 miles away

See all care homes in Devon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 May 2026 (assessment visit 15 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 16 February to 17 March 2026.

Arliemoor Care Home is a care home that provides accommodation and support for up to 10 people of working age who are experiencing severe and enduring mental health conditions. At the time of our inspection, 6 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective Inadequate
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We identified widespread and systemic serious failings in the safety, quality, and overall standard of care, resulting in 11 breaches of legal regulations relating to safeguarding, safe care and treatment, person‑centred care, dignity and respect, recruitment, staffing, notifications, governance, and provider requirements.

We found serious shortfalls in how the service protects people from harm and upholds their rights. People were not always safe, and care was not consistently provided in a way that promoted dignity, independence, and well-being. Systems and processes were ineffective, and leadership and governance did not ensure compliance with regulations.

People were exposed to avoidable harm because risks were not adequately assessed or managed effectively. For example, environmental hazards such as unrestricted windows and poor fire safety checks were not addressed promptly. Medicines were not stored securely.

The service was not well-maintained or treated with the dignity and respect expected of a place that is people’s home. The service had an unpleasant odour, and the whole service required refurbishment, with maintenance issues identified in every room.

The provider did not have effective systems in place to ensure staff were suitably trained, supervised, and supported to safely meet people’s needs.

Governance arrangements were absent. The provider had not developed or implemented governance systems capable of assessing, monitoring, or improving the health, safety, and welfare of service users or effectively driving improvements.

Staff spoke positively about the management team and described a supportive working environment where they felt valued.

At this assessment, the overall rating has changed from good to inadequate. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward. In addition, we have requested an action plan from the provider to set out how they will address the concerns found at this assessment.

This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, person-centred care, dignity and respect, staffing, recruitment and good governance.

  2. Effective

    Inadequate

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding, person-centred care, dignity, and good governance.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to requires improvement. The provider did not always treat people with kindness, empathy and compassion, or respect their privacy and dignity.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care, dignity, and good governance.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care and good governance.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to requirements where the service provider is an individual or a partnership, notification of incidents, absence, changes and good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 26 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Inadequate on 26 May 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 26 May 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 26 May 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jackie Rowe
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 14 April 2021. Latest assessment published 26 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from Devon County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Arliemoor Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Arliemoor Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Arliemoor Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Arliemoor Care Home.
When was Arliemoor Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Arliemoor Care Home was published on 26 May 2026.
Who runs Arliemoor Care Home?
Arliemoor Care Home is run by Mrs Jackie Rowe.
What is Arliemoor Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 26 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01409 254232
Address
Halsdon Cross, Holsworthy, EX22 6NX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Roses (Good, 1.7 miles away) and Halwill Manor Nursing Home (Good, 5.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    The Roses Good, 1.7 miles away
  2. –
    Deer Park Nursing Home Not yet rated, 1.9 miles away
  3. RI
    Barn Park Residential Home Requires improvement, 5.1 miles away
  4. G
    Halwill Manor Nursing Home Good, 5.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Southlands Court Residential Home Requires improvement, 5.7 miles away

See all care homes in Devon