Rated Care Homes

China Cottage Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    First rated Inadequate in 2014, most recently Good in March 2026.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 54 of 73

    rated care homes in Doncaster are rated Good, like this one.

China Cottage Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 33 beds, Doncaster

Rated Good in March 2026.

China Cottage Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Priory Lodge Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Elm Park Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
    Albany House - Doncaster Good, 1.8 miles away
  4. G
    Positive Step Good, 2.7 miles away
  5. –
    Tall Trees Not yet rated, 2.8 miles away

See all care homes in Doncaster

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 31 March 2026 (assessment visit 7 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 23 February – 4 March 2026. We visited the service on 23 February 2026 and reviewed the care and support people received along with their care records and management information. China Cottage Care Home is a ‘care home’ and provides residential care to older people. Some people using the service were living with dementia. China Cottage Care Home can accommodate up to 33 people. On the day of inspection there were 31 people living in the service. People in care homes receive accommodation and personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement dependent on their registration with us. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. We carried out this assessment under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We assessed the service due to the age of the previous rating and we reviewed all the key questions and quality statements. The care home maintained its rating of good.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The management team listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Staff concentrated on improving people’s lives while protecting their right to live in safety, free from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm and neglect. The provider shared safeguarding concerns quickly and appropriately. We found the service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and, if needed, appropriate legal authorisations were in place to deprive a person of their liberty. People’s care plans assessed and identified their care and support needs. Risks associated with people’s care were appropriately assessed and mitigations put in place which ensured care was provided safely. We identified some minor issues in relation to cleaning of the sink used by the hairdresser. Cleaning schedules for all sinks needed to be monitored and reviewed to ensure they were more effective. People received their medicines as prescribed. Members of staff had received appropriate training and were knowledgeable about all aspects of medicines administration and record keeping.

People’s needs were identified and assessed appropriately in person-centred care plans. The provider planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. They did this in line with legislation and current evidence-based good practice and standards. Members of staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. People’s care needs and outcomes were recorded in their care plan. Processes were in place to monitor people’s outcomes and maintain accurate information about their care and support. People were asked about their consent for care and support. Members of staff respected people’s views and preferences.

Staff were kind and caring. They knew the people they supported. People were treated as individuals and members of staff made sure people’s care, support and treatment met their needs and preferences. People's care plans described how people were able to make choices about clothes, dressing, washing and food preferences. We observed people were supported to maintain their independence and make informed choices throughout the day. Members of staff responded quickly to call bells and requests for support. There were sufficient members of staff to meet people’s immediate needs. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care. On-going support for members of staff based on listening to feedback needed to be sustained and embedded into practice.

The provider made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs. People’s preferred methods of communication were documented within their care records. Members of staff were able to provide information to people in a responsive way. The provider made sure people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities. The provider had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. Members of staff engaged with local health professionals and the wider community to ensure people had access to a broad range of services and support. The provider listened and responded positively to feedback, and they took action to improve areas which had been brought to their attention.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness,dignityand respect.At our last assessment we rated this key questiongood. At thisassessmentthe rating hasremainedgood.This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Louise Parks
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 29 January 2022. Latest assessment published 31 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02660244 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from City of Doncaster Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does China Cottage Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists China Cottage Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does China Cottage Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 33 beds at China Cottage Care Home.
When was China Cottage Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for China Cottage Care Home was published on 31 March 2026.
Who runs China Cottage Care Home?
China Cottage Care Home is run by Doncaster Property Investment Fund Limited.
What is China Cottage Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 31 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01302 724815
Address
154 Owston Road, Carcroft, Doncaster, DN6 8EA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Priory Lodge Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Elm Park Care Home Good, 1.4 miles away
  3. G
    Albany House - Doncaster Good, 1.8 miles away
  4. G
    Positive Step Good, 2.7 miles away
  5. –
    Tall Trees Not yet rated, 2.8 miles away

See all care homes in Doncaster