Rated Care Homes

Park House Rest Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 42 of 50

    rated care homes in Stockton-on-Tees are rated Good, like this one.

Park House Rest Home: inspection record

Care home, 18 beds, Stockton-on-Tees

Rated Good in April 2026.

Park House Rest Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Windsor Court Residential Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Edwardian Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Lorne House Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Oxbridge House Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Stockton-on-Tees

See all care homes in Central Stockton-on-Tees

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 April 2026 (assessment visit 31 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 6 January to 10 February 2026. A site visit was carried out on 6 January 2026. The assessment was carried out due to the age of the rating – 4 years since the previous inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Park House Rest Home is an 18-bed residential home mainly caring for older people. An inspection was conducted to evaluate the quality, safety, and effectiveness of care within the service. The home was found to provide a generally warm, sociable, and person-centred environment, with staff demonstrating‑ positive engagement and responsiveness to residents’ needs. The service demonstrated safe, effective, caring, responsive, and well led practices throughout the inspection. No significant concerns were identified‑.

The premises were clean, well-maintained, and free from malodours. Safety equipment and fire notices were prominently displayed, and infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were evident. Temperature concerns were noted in two areas but may have been influenced by unusually cold weather‑.

The home maintained appropriate staffing levels, supported by a visible management team. Staff displayed a good understanding of people’s’ needs and demonstrated compassionate, respectful interactions. Leaders were engaged, responsive, and proactive in addressing issues as they arose.
People appeared comfortable, sociable, and well supported. Mealtime observations showed high-quality, appetizing food with dignified and unhurried assistance‑ for those who needed it. Activities were varied and inclusive, with good participation across different communal areas.

There were a small number of people with anxiety or behavioural needs, two requiring thickened fluids, and two with monitored weightconcerns. These people’s needs were being met and their progress monitored effectively. Risks (such as falls) were actively managed through sensor equipment and external team involvement where needed.

Visitors felt welcomed and comfortable, supported by a digital signing in system and staff who maintained‑ warm, professional interactions. Technology such as Skype/FaceTime was used effectively to support remote family connections.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good, however some elements of this key question were Outstanding.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm, and evidence gathered as well as people’s feedback confirmed this.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michael Forster
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 2 October 2021. Latest assessment published 22 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Getting help from Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Park House Rest Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Park House Rest Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Park House Rest Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 18 beds at Park House Rest Home.
When was Park House Rest Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Park House Rest Home was published on 22 April 2026.
Who runs Park House Rest Home?
Park House Rest Home is run by Mr & Mrs J Elliott.
What is Park House Rest Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 April 2026.