Rated Care Homes

Reddington House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Reddington House: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Kent

Rated Good in November 2017.

Reddington House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    St Stephens Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    Chitty Barn Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Avondale Castlemount Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Felbrigg House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Dover

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 November 2026 (assessment visit 9 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Reddington House is a care home registered to provide accommodation and personal care to 5 people with learning disabilities. At the time of the inspection there were 4 people receiving the regulated activity living at Reddington House.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This is a specialist service for autistic people and people with a learning disability. It provides support for people who may display distressed behaviours.The service uses a household model of care. People live in small groups that share a kitchen, lounge and dining area. This helps create a familiar home environment where staff can support people in a more personal and flexible way.

We carried out this assessment between 20 August and 11 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

The provider was exceptional at promoting people's independence, choice and control. People were supported to make informed decisions about their care and treatment, including decisions which involved significant risks. Staff balanced people's rights with proactive risk management and worked closely with health and social care professionals to achieve the best possible outcomes which improved their health and well-being significantly. Staff showed empathy, understanding and persistence during difficult periods. They told us they treated people with kindness, compassion, dignity and respect. One staff member told us, "It was a difficult time but we stayed together and focused on supporting the individual through the decision."

People experienced positive outcomes because staff placed them at the centre of decision-making and delivered highly personalised, proactive support that consistently adapted to changing needs. Staff worked effectively with health professionals to uphold the person's choice while implementing skilled Positive Behaviour Support strategies that prevented escalation and significantly improved quality of life. Incidents of heightened risk reduced significantly to none, resulting in sustained improvements in the person's mental health, emotional wellbeing, communication, confidence and independence. The person re-engaged with their community, resumed meaningful activities and achieved outcomes that enhanced their wellbeing and daily lived experience. A professional described “significant improvement” in mood, communication skills and day-to-day enjoyment, demonstrating the difference staff had made to the person's life.

The provider demonstrated a strong culture of learning, innovation and improvement. Learning from incidents, feedback and reflective practice was embedded throughout the organisation and used to improve outcomes for people. The provider also contributed to wider sector learning through joint training, workforce development and sharing good practice. Professionals described leaders as approachable, reflective and committed to improvement. One professional told us, "The service responded positively to professional input and was committed to continuously improving outcomes for people." Another said, "100 % Reddington House is well led” and “Reddington House works so well, due to the fact it is so well led.”

Professionals described the service as safe and proactive. One professional told us, "The service is absolutely safe." Staff demonstrated a strong understanding of safeguarding and were confident to raise concerns when required. One staff member said, "If I saw a colleague using unnecessary force or being abusive in any way to a person, I would raise it as safeguarding. Even if it was the manager, I would report it."

Staff assessed and understood people’s individual needs and adapted support in response to changes in their circumstances. One staff member told us, "What is important is to treat them as human beings." Another said, "This place is their home. We work with them and work around them."

People were supported to pursue meaningful goals, maintain relationships, access employment and participate in their communities. Staff focused on people's strengths and ambitions, working creatively to remove barriers and create opportunities. As a result, people gained confidence, developed life skills and achieved outcomes that were important to them.

There were effective systems and processes in place to monitor quality, safety and performance. Leaders promoted the provider's values through regular engagement activities, reflective practice and staff involvement. Staff wellbeing was actively promoted and staff felt valued, listened to and supported. One staff member told us, "I love coming to work. It gives me a good feeling because we make a huge difference to people's lives." Another said, "The best managers ever. They help you out with everything. They support staff and service users. You can talk to them freely with any problems. It makes a massive difference."

There were enough staff to support people safely. People were supported by skilled and knowledgeable staff who received training, supervision and ongoing development. Medicines were managed safely and people's health, care and communication needs were regularly reviewed. One staff member told us, "Staffing level is fine. The staffing level is safe for staff and people." A professional commented, "If additional skills or support are needed, staff work together and involve the wider multidisciplinary team to ensure people receive the right support."

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lara Bywater
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 16 December 2020. Latest assessment published 7 November 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03819196 (opens Companies House)

LDC Care Company Ltd runs 5 services, all in the South East. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by LDC Care Company Ltd

  1. O
    Chitty Barn Outstanding. Care home, Kent
  2. O
    The Glen Outstanding. Care home, Kent
  3. G
    Little Glen Good. Care home, Kent
  4. –
    LDC Care Co Supported Living - Birch Tree Not yet rated. Home care, Kent

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Reddington House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Reddington House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Reddington House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Reddington House.
When was Reddington House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Reddington House was published on 7 November 2026.
Who runs Reddington House?
Reddington House is run by LDC Care Company Ltd. It runs 5 services, all in the South East.
What is Reddington House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 November 2017.

Contact

Phone
01303 276000
Address
2 Park Avenue, Dover, CT16 1ER Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    St Stephens Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    Chitty Barn Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Avondale Castlemount Lodge Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Felbrigg House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Dover