Rated Care Homes

King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities: inspection record

Care home, 18 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, up from Inadequate.

King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Mountview Care Home (Good, 1.1 miles away) and Quarry Hill Grange Residential Home (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Highbury Residential Home No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Bluebell House Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Mountview Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Rose Cottage Rest Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 June 2026 (assessment visit 30 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection 19 20 May 2026. The inspection of this location was prompted due to the service being in special measures. We undertook a comprehensive inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

King Street, Care Home Physical Disabilities provide accommodation for people requiring nursing or personal care. The building is purpose built with ensuite rooms, including various communal spaces which comprise of multiple lounges, kitchens and dining areas, a games room, a gym space and bathroom facilities. The service provides support to autistic people and to people with learning and physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 17 people receiving the regulated activity of personal care. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider demonstrated a proactive and transparent safety culture, where staff listened to concerns, reported incidents and used learning to improve practice.

People were involved in managing risks associated with their care, systems were in place that guided staff in meeting a wide range of complex health needs. Person‑centred risk assessments and clear clinical protocols ensured staff had the information required to deliver safe, consistent care while promoting independence.

Staffing skill mix and experience were improving. The provider had taken proactive steps to recruit and onboard new team members following a recent service restructure. However, the skill mix and experience within the team had not always been sufficient to fully meet people’s needs. At times, this had affected the consistency of care delivered and limited people’s opportunities to access the community and pursue their personal goals and interests. The provider recognised these shortfalls and was taking action to address them through ongoing recruitment and development of the workforce.

People did not consistently have clear progression plans setting out how they would be supported to develop skills, increase independence or achieve their personal goals. As a result, opportunities for growth were not always identified or monitored, and staff did not consistently promote people’s progress. This limited people’s ability to move forward in line with their aspirations and potential.

Governance and accountability arrangements were developing well, with clear progress made since the last inspection. The interim manager had introduced strengthened oversight, improved risk‑management processes and more structured monitoring systems, supported by increased involvement from the wider leadership team. These changes were beginning to enhance visibility of risk, improve responsiveness and support safer, more consistent practice. Although these systems were still embedding and had not yet delivered sustained improvements across all areas, there was a strong commitment to ongoing development, and the foundations for more effective, reliable governance were clearly taking shape.

The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to Safe Care and Treatment, Safe and Effective Staffing and Good Governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

This service has been in Special Measures since 17 October 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last inspection rating inspection, we rated this key question Inadequate. At this inspection the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    This means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last rated inspection, we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last rated inspection, we rated this key question Inadequate. At this inspection the rating has changed to Requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last rated inspection, we rated this key question Requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has remained Requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last rated inspection, we rated this key question Inadequate. At this inspection the rating has changed to Requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 29 June 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  2. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 29 June 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 29 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 20 December 2018. Latest assessment published 29 June 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Leonard Cheshire DisabilityBrand: Leonard Cheshire Disability
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
00552847 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
218186

Leonard Cheshire Disability runs 41 services in England, 3 of them in the East Midlands. 25 are rated Good or Outstanding, 14 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Leonard Cheshire Disability

  1. G
    Appley Cliff - Care Home Physical Disabilities Good. Care home, Isle of Wight, South East
  2. G
    Athol House - Care Home Physical Disabilities Good. Care home, Southwark, London
  3. G
    Bells Piece Supported Living Service Good. Home care, Surrey, South East
  4. G
    Bradbury House - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities Good. Care home with nursing, County Durham, North East

See all 41 services run by Leonard Cheshire Disability

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 18 beds at King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities.
When was King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities was published on 29 June 2026.
Who runs King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities?
King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities is run by Leonard Cheshire Disability. It runs 41 services in England, 3 of them in the East Midlands.
What is King Street - Care Home Physical Disabilities's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 29 June 2026.

Contact

Phone
01509 817750
Address
61/63 King Street, Sileby, LE12 7LZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Mountview Care Home (Good, 1.1 miles away) and Quarry Hill Grange Residential Home (Good, 1.3 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. –
    Highbury Residential Home No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
  2. –
    Bluebell House Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Mountview Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
  5. G
    Rose Cottage Rest Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire