Norlands Nursing Home
- Care home
- 21 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Newton Heath, Manchester, North West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Good in 2016, most recently Good in July 2026.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
56 of 71
rated care homes in Manchester are rated Good, like this one.
Norlands Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Good in July 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Church Lane Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Next Steps Good, 0.4 miles away
- – Next Steps Ashley Lane Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- – Next Steps Mental Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G Oakbank Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2026 (assessment visit 3 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 10to 16 June2026.
Norlands nursing home provides personal care and treatment for up to 21 people. At the time of assessment, 16 people lived at the service, including 13 who required nursing care. Many people were living with dementia. The service supported adults aged over 65 with a range of needs.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
The service benefited from strong, visible leadership. Managers were regularly present in the home, led by example and provided support to people, relatives and staff during significant life events.
Effective governance systems monitored quality and safety, and regular audits identified themes, drove improvement and promoted learning. Managers sought feedback from people, relatives and staff and used it to improve the service.
Safe recruitment processes were in place, and staffing levels were regularly reviewed. Staff knew people well, including their needs, preferences and personal histories, which supported consistent, personalised care.
Staff reported having enough time to complete their duties and felt supported by colleagues and managers. They had access to the information needed to support people safely and spoke positively about their roles and the service.
Medicines were largely managed safely. Nurses received appropriate training and competency assessments. We identified minor medicines errors during the assessment. The registered manager responded immediately by introducing daily and weekly monitoring checks, which were fully implemented the same day. The provider later submitted evidence of their effectiveness. A new electronic system had also been procured, and this will further reduce the risk of errors.
Although there had been no recent safeguarding referrals, managers and staff understood safeguarding responsibilities and reporting processes. Staff received regular training and knew how to recognise, respond to and escalate concerns.
People received person-centred care. Care plans reflected individual preferences and were reviewed regularly to ensure they remained up to date. People received home-cooked meals that met their preferences and dietary needs, including well-presented modified diets that supported enjoyment of meals.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Managers and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Patience Ncube
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)7 inspection reports, latest 9 August 2019. Latest assessment published 28 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- J J Bordiuk and M Bordiuk
- Ownership type
- Partnership
Getting help from Manchester City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Manchester City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0161 234 5001
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Care home fee rates published by the council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Norlands Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Norlands Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Norlands Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 21 beds at Norlands Nursing Home.
- When was Norlands Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Norlands Nursing Home was published on 28 July 2026.
- Who runs Norlands Nursing Home?
- Norlands Nursing Home is run by J J Bordiuk and M Bordiuk.
- What is Norlands Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 0161 205 9525
- Address
- Monsall Road, Newton Heath, Manchester, M40 8NQ Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Church Lane Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Next Steps Good, 0.4 miles away
- – Next Steps Ashley Lane Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- – Next Steps Mental Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G Oakbank Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away