Rated Care Homes

Welcome House - Leeza Court

I

Inadequate

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • The only one

    rated Inadequate care home in Medway, out of 59 with a rating.

Welcome House - Leeza Court: inspection record

Care home, 16 beds, Medway

Rated Inadequate in November 2025, down from Good.

Welcome House - Leeza Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: 36a Birling Avenue (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Avenues South East - 25 Beacon Close (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    36a Birling Avenue Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Platters Farm Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    351 Maidstone Road Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Medway

See all care homes in Rainham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 November 2025 (assessment visit 17 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 29 September to 07 October 2025. Welcome House-Leeza Court is a residential care home supporting people living with mental health conditions. The service is registered to support up to 16 people and at the time of our inspection 15 people were being supported at Leeza Court. Not everyone supported by this service received the regulated activity of personal care. This assessment looked at people’s personal care and support. At the time of our assessment, the provider was supporting 5 people with personal care.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective Inadequate
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive Inadequate
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service was last inspected in December 2019 and rated “Good”. CQC conducted a further inspection in February 2022 to monitor how the service was complying with infection prevention protocols as part of our regulatory response to the COVID-19 pandemic, however these inspections were not formally rated. We conducted this inspection due to the length of time since the last full inspection, and in response to information of concern shared with us by partner organisations.

We found that despite people having complex mental health conditions which placed them at significant risk of coming to harm, there was a lack of robust guidance on how people’s mental wellbeing would be supported proactively or how staff should respond if people were to become distressed or put themselves or others at risk through their actions. There was a lack of consistency in how people were supported depending on which staff interacted with them. This meant people were at greater risk of coming to harm through an inconsistent understanding of their needs.

People were able to use the service as they wished and were encouraged and supported to go into the community independently and take part in the things that mattered to them. There were sufficient staff at the service who were safely recruited and treated people with kindness. However, governance systems at the service were not effective and had not identified significant risks to people such as ligature or fire safety risks. People had a range of complex health conditions where there was no plan or guidance on how the service or staff should support people in staying healthy and well.

The provider had not acted with openness or integrity when allegations of abuse or neglect had been raised and failed to report these in line with requirements. Where people had restrictions put in place on their daily lives, these were not clearly assessed to determine if people lacked capacity or not and if decisions made were in their best interest.

We identified 8 breaches of legal regulation in relation to consent, safe care and treatment, safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment, person centred care, staff training, treating people with dignity and respect, failure to submit statutory notifications and good governance. This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, and safeguarding service users from abuse or neglect. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.

  2. Effective

    Inadequate

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to consent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    The service was in breach of regulation in relation to person centred care and treating people with dignity and respect

  4. Responsive

    Inadequate

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant services were not planned or delivered in ways that met people’s needs.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance, and failure to submit statutory notifications

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 20 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Inadequate on 20 November 2025. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 20 November 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Inadequate on 20 November 2025. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Vitalis Akandu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Mental Health

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 3 March 2022. Latest assessment published 20 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Toqeer Aslam
Ownership type
Individual

Toqeer Aslam runs 5 services, all in the South East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Toqeer Aslam

  1. G
    Welcome House - Gillingham Homes Good. Care home, Medway
  2. G
    Welcome House - Ruby Lodge Good. Care home, Kent
  3. RI
    Welcome House - Nickleby Lodge Requires improvement. Care home, Medway
  4. RI
    Welcome House - The Chestnuts Requires improvement. Care home, Medway

Getting help from Medway Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Welcome House - Leeza Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Welcome House - Leeza Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Welcome House - Leeza Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 16 beds at Welcome House - Leeza Court.
When was Welcome House - Leeza Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Welcome House - Leeza Court was published on 20 November 2025.
Who runs Welcome House - Leeza Court?
Welcome House - Leeza Court is run by Toqeer Aslam. It runs 5 services, all in the South East.
What is Welcome House - Leeza Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 20 November 2025.

Contact

Phone
01634 377667
Address
9 London Road, Rainham, Gillingham, ME8 7RG Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: 36a Birling Avenue (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Avenues South East - 25 Beacon Close (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    36a Birling Avenue Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Platters Farm Lodge Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    351 Maidstone Road Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Medway

See all care homes in Rainham