Rated Care Homes

Prior Bank House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 3 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 87 of 107

    rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

Prior Bank House: inspection record

Care home, 32 beds, Sheffield

Rated Good in April 2024.

Prior Bank House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Seven Hills Nursing Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Kingfield Mews Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Kenwood House Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Sheldon House Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Twelve Trees Residential Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Ecclesall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 2 April 2024 (assessment visit 23 January 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Prior Bank House is a residential care home that can accommodate up to 32 people. At the time of the assessment there were 31 people living at the service. Prior Bank House specialises in the care of older people. We rated this service under our previous methodology on 5 February 2020, where it was inspected and rated good overall, and for all key questions. We carried out this assessment on 6 February 2024. We looked at 6 quality statements; Safeguarding; Involving people to manage risks; Safe and effective staffing; Infection prevention and control; Independence, choice and control and Equity in experiences and outcomes.

  • Safe Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found the service remains rated good overall.

  1. Safe

    Good

    People were safeguarded from abuse and possible harm. Staff received safeguarding training and demonstrated a clear understanding about how to recognise and report abuse and poor care. The registered manager understood their responsibility to refer any safeguarding matters to the appropriate agencies. Individual risk assessments were completed for people so that identifiable risks were managed. The service was in the process of introducing electronic care plans.

    People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

    Safe staffing levels were in place. Staff were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard. Robust recruitment procedures in place so people were cared for by suitably qualified staff who had been assessed as safe to work with people.

    The approach to assessing and managing the risk of infection required attention. The audit tool being used had not identified some areas that needed cleaning or maintaining or change of practice. The registered manager took immediate action in response to our feedback.

  2. Caring

    Good

    People told us they were treated with kindness, compassion and dignity in their day-to-day care and support. Staff knew about people’s health needs and personal preferences and gave them as much choice and control as possible. People and their relatives were actively involved in developing their care plans. This included identifying their needs on the grounds of equality characteristics and looking at how those needs would be met. It also included finding out about their choices and preferences. We observed people were promoted to be as independent as possible. People were provided with meaningful activities, linked to their hobbies and interests.

  3. Responsive

    Good

    People’s personal, cultural, social and religious needs were understood and met. The service complied with legal equality and human rights requirements, including avoiding discrimination, having regard to the needs of people with different protected characteristics and making reasonable adjustments to support equity in experience and outcomes

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Simone Clover
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 20 February 2020. Latest assessment published 2 April 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Anchor Hanover GroupBrand: Anchor
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
RS007843 (opens Companies House)

Anchor Hanover Group runs 131 services in England, 32 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 111 are rated Good or Outstanding, 18 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Anchor Hanover Group

  1. O
    Beech Hall Outstanding. Care home, Leeds
  2. O
    St Anne's - Saltash Outstanding. Care home, Cornwall, South West
  3. O
    West Hall Outstanding. Care home, Surrey, South East
  4. G
    Anchor Integrated Care & Housing Village - Denham Garden Village Good. Home care, Buckinghamshire, South East

See all 131 services run by Anchor Hanover Group

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Prior Bank House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Prior Bank House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Prior Bank House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at Prior Bank House.
When was Prior Bank House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Prior Bank House was published on 2 April 2024.
Who runs Prior Bank House?
Prior Bank House is run by Anchor Hanover Group. It runs 131 services in England, 32 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Prior Bank House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 2 April 2024.

Contact

Address
74 Cherry Tree Road, Sheffield, S11 9AB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Seven Hills Nursing Home Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Kingfield Mews Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Kenwood House Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Sheldon House Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    Twelve Trees Residential Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Ecclesall