Rated Care Homes

Ann Challis

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 5 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 23 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 34 of 47

    rated care homes in Trafford are rated Good, like this one.

Ann Challis: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Trafford

Rated Good in November 2024, up from Requires improvement.

Ann Challis: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Manorhey Care Centre Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Brookfield Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Faversham House Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. O
    Urmston Manor Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  5. RI
    Haylands Residential Home for Gentlemen Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Trafford

See all care homes in Urmston

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 November 2024 (assessment visit 11 October 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 22 and 23 October 2024. The service is a residential care home providing support to older women living with dementia. People felt safe. People and their families were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff understood and managed risks. Assessments and risks were regularly reviewed. Managers investigated incidents, and actions were taken to reduce the possibility of a reoccurrence. The home was clean throughout. Equipment was serviced and maintained. There were enough trained staff on duty to meet people’s needs. Staff supervisions and staff meetings were used to discuss good practice. People received their medicines as prescribed. People enjoyed the food, and their nutritional needs were met. People’s health was monitored and feedback from medical professionals was positive about working with the home. Staff sought people’s consent before providing support. Where people did not have capacity to make decisions, their relatives were involved in agreeing best interest decisions on their behalf. People and relatives said staff were kind. We observed positive interactions throughout the assessment. Staff responded to people’s needs in a timely way. Staff knew people’s individual needs and protected their privacy and dignity. Activities were arranged for people to take part in if they wished to do so, including external singers. The home had a pet dog, which some people enjoyed taking out for a walk with staff. People and relatives said communication with the home was good. They said they could speak with the manager if they needed to, and any concerns would be listened to and resolved. People’s wishes for their care at the end of their lives was discussed with them. Governance systems were in place and any actions identified had been completed. The management team, including the director, were visible in the home and were said to be approachable. Staff enjoyed working at Ann Challis and felt well supported. Feedback from partners was positive.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs. At our last inspection we rated this key question good. At this inspection the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this inspection the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kirsty Lawson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

11 inspection reports, latest 10 March 2022. Latest assessment published 19 November 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06487402 (opens Companies House)

J.E.M. Care Limited runs 2 services, all in the North West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by J.E.M. Care Limited

  1. RI
    Haylands Residential Home for Gentlemen Requires improvement. Care home, Trafford

Getting help from Trafford Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Ann Challis provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Ann Challis as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Ann Challis have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Ann Challis.
When was Ann Challis last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Ann Challis was published on 19 November 2024.
Who runs Ann Challis?
Ann Challis is run by J.E.M. Care Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the North West.
What is Ann Challis's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 November 2024.

Contact

Address
128 Stretford Road, Urmston, Manchester, M41 9LT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Manorhey Care Centre Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Brookfield Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Faversham House Nursing Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. O
    Urmston Manor Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  5. RI
    Haylands Residential Home for Gentlemen Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Trafford

See all care homes in Urmston