York Lodge
- Care home
- 22 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Crowborough, East Sussex, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Inadequate in 2015, most recently Good in January 2020.
7 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
214 of 258
rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Good, like this one.
York Lodge: inspection record
Rated Good in January 2020.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Baronsmede Good, 0.1 miles away
- RI Dalling House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
- G St Anthony Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Heather View Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G Windlesham Manor Good, 0.7 miles away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 24 January 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
York Lodge is located in Crowborough and provides accommodation and personal care for up to 22 older people. The home also provides respite (short -term) care for people. The home is set out over three floors with a basement for the laundry facility. There is lift access between the ground floor and upper levels. At the time of our inspection there were 22 people living at the home. Everybody living at York Lodge was living with dementia and some people had mobility and sensory challenges.
What inspectors found
Systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service provided were in place. However, there were areas of peoples' documentation that needed to be improved to ensure staff had the necessary up to date information to provide consistent, safe care. Whilst care plans identified a care need, there was a lack of clear guidance and changes to care needs were not clearly defined. Staff were able to discuss best interest decisions and who was involved, however these and the rationale for the decision was not always documented. This meant that agency staff and new staff would not have the relevant information to support care decisions. This included the use of sensor mats and covert medicine.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
People received safe care and support from staff who had been appropriately recruited, trained to recognise signs of abuse or risk and understood what to do to safely support people. One person said, "I feel safe here." A visitor told us, "Staff are very vigilant about peoples' safety, good security." People were supported to take positive risks, to ensure they had as much choice and control of their lives as possible. We saw that people were supported to be as independent as possible with the use of walking aids and specialised cutlery for eating. We observed medicines being given safely to people by trained and knowledgeable staff, who had been assessed as competent. There were enough staff to meet people's needs. The provider used a dependency tool to determine staffing levels. Staffing levels were regularly reviewed following falls or changes in a person's health condition. Safe recruitment practices had been followed before staff started working at the service.
Staff had all received training to meet people's specific needs. During induction, they got to know people and their needs well. One staff member said, "It's really lovely here, everyone works as a team to make sure we support people in the safest and best way. We got lots of training to do this." People's nutritional and health needs were consistently met with involvement from a variety of health and social care professionals.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
Everyone we spoke to was consistent in their views that staff were kind, caring and supportive. One visitor said, "Very kind and polite staff, the atmosphere is good, I feel welcomed every time I visit." People were relaxed, comfortable and happy in the company of staff. People's independence was considered important
by all staff and their privacy and dignity was promoted.
Staff were committed to delivering care in a person-centred way based on people's preferences and wishes. There was a stable staff team who were knowledgeable about the people they supported and had built trusting and meaningful relationships with them. Activities were tailor-made to people's preferences and interests. People were encouraged to go out and form relationships with family and members of the community. Staff knew people's communication needs well and we observed them using a variety of tools, such as method sign language, pictures and objects of reference, to gain their views.
People were involved in their care planning. End of life care planning and documentation guided staff in providing care at this important stage of people's lives. End of life care was delivered empathetically and with respect and dignity.
People, their relatives and health care professionals had the opportunity to share their views about the service. Complaints made by people or their relatives were taken seriously and thoroughly investigated. The provider and registered manager were committed to continuously improve and had developed structures and plans to develop and consistently drive improvement within the service and maintain their care delivery to a good standard.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 24 January 2020. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Lindsay Filshie
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Sensory Impairment
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 24 January 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04484475 (opens Companies House)
Millcroft & York Lodge Care Homes Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Millcroft & York Lodge Care Homes Limited
- G Millcroft Good. Care home, East Sussex
Getting help from East Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 60 80 191, 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week (including bank holidays)
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does York Lodge provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists York Lodge as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does York Lodge have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 22 beds at York Lodge.
- When was York Lodge last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for York Lodge was published on 24 January 2020.
- Who runs York Lodge?
- York Lodge is run by Millcroft & York Lodge Care Homes Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
- What is York Lodge's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 January 2020.
Contact
- Phone
- 01892 661457
- Address
- 3 Myrtle Road, Crowborough, TN6 1EY Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Baronsmede Good, 0.1 miles away
- RI Dalling House Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
- G St Anthony Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Heather View Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
- G Windlesham Manor Good, 0.7 miles away