Rated Care Homes

Acacia House - Peterborough

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 25 of 31

    rated care homes in Peterborough are rated Good, like this one.

Acacia House - Peterborough: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Peterborough

Rated Good in August 2025.

Acacia House - Peterborough: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Werrington Lodge Good, 2.3 miles away
  2. G
    SENSE - Newton Court Good, 2.5 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    SENSE - 37 Redgate Court Good, 3.1 miles away
  5. G
    SENSE - 38 Redgate Court Good, 3.1 miles away

See all care homes in Peterborough

See all care homes in Eye

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 22 August 2025 (assessment visit 9 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 22 May to 16 July 2025. The service is a residential care home providing personal care and support to adults of all ages with a learning disability or autistic people or people with mental health needs.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Staff supported people safely and were trained and knew how to report concerns, including safeguarding concerns. People’s needs were assessed and updated to help ensure records held to guide staff were current. People’s known risks, such as being at a higher risk of falling, or medicines support had been assessed and were monitored by staff. This helped to reduce the risk of harm where possible. Staff encouraged people to take positive risks including the promotion of people’s life skills and activities and interests in the community. There were enough trained and skilled staff to support people safely. The environment of the service and garden were maintained to help ensure they remained safe, and staff followed good infection control procedures. Staff liaised with external health and social care professionals to make sure that specialist advice and guidance was sought when needed. This helped ensure that people stayed as healthy as possible. Staff understood the importance of supporting people in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and encouraged people to make their own day to day choices. Staff supported people to achieve their individual goals. This included learning new life skills to promote their independence. People’s care records were detailed and guided staff on how to support people safely. Staff supported people with kindness and respect whilst protecting their right to privacy and dignity.

The management team had a good oversight of the service. Audits, and quality monitoring had identified areas such as staff recording, as requiring improvement. There was no registered manager at the service during this assessment. There was a positive culture at the service and people were seen to be happy and staff told us they enjoyed their roles. People’s relatives told us they were confident to raise any concerns and although they had not yet had to do so, they felt confident that they would be listened to.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 23 March 2021. Latest assessment published 22 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Community Care Solutions LimitedBrand: Lifeways Community Care
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04122627 (opens Companies House)

Community Care Solutions Limited runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in the East of England. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Community Care Solutions Limited

  1. G
    Aspen House Good. Care home, North Northamptonshire, East Midlands
  2. G
    Kimbolton Good. Care home, Bedford
  3. –
    Elliot Avenue No overall rating. Care home, Peterborough

Getting help from Peterborough City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Acacia House - Peterborough provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Acacia House - Peterborough as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Acacia House - Peterborough have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Acacia House - Peterborough.
When was Acacia House - Peterborough last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Acacia House - Peterborough was published on 22 August 2025.
Who runs Acacia House - Peterborough?
Acacia House - Peterborough is run by Community Care Solutions Limited. It runs 4 services in England, 3 of them in the East of England.
What is Acacia House - Peterborough's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 22 August 2025.