Rated Care Homes

Island Sands Residential Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 12 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 2 years

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Island Sands Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 44 beds, Kent

Rated Good in May 2024, up from Requires improvement.

Island Sands Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Ocean Heights Residential Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Willows Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Winchester House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Barton Court Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. –
    Meadows Not yet rated, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Halfway Houses

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 May 2024 (assessment visit 19 January 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it. The Little Oyster Residential Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 64 people. The service supports people with learning disabilities and autism, physical disabilities and mental health conditions. The main building is arranged across 2 floors with lift access and the service has an annex, bungalows and flats on the same site. Only 1 of the flats was occupied. At the time of our assessment there were 14 living at the service. We carried out this assessment between 7 February 2024 and 13 February 2024. We looked at how the service assessed and planned for people's care needs, and how they trained and supervised staff to support people according to their needs and preferences. We spoke with 10 people, 1 relative and 11 staff during the assessment. We observed care and support in communal areas and reviewed 6 people’s care plans, as well as general records for the service. These included staff training records, meeting records, policies and procedures and audits.

  • Safe Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    People lived safely and were protected from avoidable harm. Staff and leaders were able to identify situations that amounted to safeguarding and staff were confident to use the whistleblowing process if needed. Risks were managed well. Staff knew people well and were able to identify changes in behaviours and presentation that meant that people were feeling anxious, upset or concerned about something. Risk assessments provided detail of triggers and steps to take to support people when required. Lessons were learned when things went wrong. Medicines were administered and recorded safely and in line with service policies. Staff were recruited safely and were supported through training and with ongoing supervision and appraisal meetings. There were enough staff to support people safely. Ongoing training made sure that staff had the skills needed to support people. The provider had a proactive and positive culture of safety. Accidents and incidents were reviewed and actioned by the management team, safety checks undertaken by staff. The provider worked with people and partners including local authority care managers and health professionals to establish and maintain safe systems of care. The provider had systems and processes in place to detect and control potential risks in the care environment and processes in place to assess and manage the risk of infection. We were assured that the provider was promoting safety through the layout and hygiene practices of the premises.

  2. Caring

    Good

    The provider had systems and processes in place to promote and support staff wellbeing. Staff told us they received appropriate support.

  3. Responsive

    Good

    The provider had systems and processes in place to understand the diverse health and care needs of people living at the service. The service was being supported by paramedics on a daily basis and the GP was conducting weekly visits.

  4. Well-led

    Good

    There was an inclusive and positive culture of continuous learning and improvement. This was based on meeting the needs of people who use services. Leaders proactively supported staff and collaborated with partners to deliver care that was safe and person-centred. There were effective governance and management systems in place. Information about risks, performance and outcomes was used effectively to improve care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sarah Cass
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

18 inspection reports, latest 2 November 2023. Latest assessment published 28 May 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07154099 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Island Sands Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Island Sands Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Island Sands Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 44 beds at Island Sands Residential Care Home.
When was Island Sands Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Island Sands Residential Care Home was published on 28 May 2024.
Who runs Island Sands Residential Care Home?
Island Sands Residential Care Home is run by Little Oyster Limited.
What is Island Sands Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 May 2024.

Contact

Phone
01795 870608
Address
Seaside Avenue, Minster-on-Sea, Sheerness, ME12 2NJ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. –
    Ocean Heights Residential Home Not yet rated, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Willows Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Winchester House Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Barton Court Good, 0.8 miles away
  5. –
    Meadows Not yet rated, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Halfway Houses