Rated Care Homes

Greystoke Manor

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 250 of 309

    rated care homes in West Sussex are rated Good, like this one.

Greystoke Manor: inspection record

Care home, 37 beds, West Sussex

Rated Good in July 2026.

Greystoke Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cornwell House, Beehive Care Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Scotch Dyke Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Langbury House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Haviland House Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    White Lodge Residential Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 July 2026 (assessment visit 12 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 26 May – 10 June 2026. Greystoke Manor is a residential care home providing support to people with a variety of health conditions, including frailty of old age and dementia. This assessment was undertaken due to an aged rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff were not always deployed to ensure people received support in a timely manner. Pre-employment checks were not always completed or documented to ensure new staff had relevant experience to undertake their roles or were of good character. People and their relatives expressed concerns about the quantity and standard of the food on offer. All these issues had been acknowledged by the provider with a view to improvements being made. A range of audits was in place, but had not identified the concerns found at this inspection.

There was a culture of learning when accidents or incidents occurred. Safe systems ensured consistent and co-ordinated care when people moved between services. Safeguarding requirements were met and any instances of abuse or alleged abuse were notified appropriately to the local authority and the Commission. People’s risks were assessed and managed safely, and the home provided a safe, clean environment. Staff completed a range of training in line with their roles, and had regular supervision meetings.

People’s needs were assessed before they moved into the home, and a range of monitoring tools was used to support the care they received from staff. A variety of health and social care professionals supported people to live healthier lives, and to achieve good outcomes. There were some issues with the quality of food on offer, but with a new chef being recently appointed, the management team were hopeful of improvements. People’s consent to care was routinely sought by staff.

People were cared for by staff who were kind and knew them well; their dignity was respected. People were encouraged with their independence, and a range of activities supported this. The home supported staff with their wellbeing and regular supervisions, enabling staff to make suggestions or voice any concerns.

People received personalised care that catered for their likes, dislikes and preferences. Care plans provided information for staff about how people wished to be cared for. People’s wishes were sought before they reached the end of their lives, and care plans documented these.

The culture of the home shaped the environment, the quality of care and daily life for people and staff. A positive culture had been developed that was focused on person-centred care and giving people dignity and choice on what was important to them.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Stephanie Johnson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 14 March 2018. Latest assessment published 15 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Individual

Getting help from West Sussex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Greystoke Manor provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Greystoke Manor as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Greystoke Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 37 beds at Greystoke Manor.
When was Greystoke Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Greystoke Manor was published on 15 July 2026.
Who runs Greystoke Manor?
Greystoke Manor is run by Mr Ian Bradley.
What is Greystoke Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01903 700228
Address
Church Lane, Ferring, BN12 5HR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cornwell House, Beehive Care Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. G
    Scotch Dyke Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. RI
    Langbury House Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Haviland House Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    White Lodge Residential Home Good, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in West Sussex