Rated Care Homes

Dean Park

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 34 of 43

    rated care homes in Swindon are rated Good, like this one.

Dean Park: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Swindon

Rated Good in July 2026.

Dean Park: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Laurel Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    Kings Court Care Centre Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Princess Lodge Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Lindum House Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Bath Road Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Swindon

See all care homes in Central Swindon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 July 2026 (assessment visit 28 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment 29 May and 31 May 2026.

Dean Park is a care home, registered to support up to 5 people with learning disabilities. At the time of the assessment, 5 people were receiving a regulated activity.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Outstanding
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service provided support to people with a learning disability and autistic people. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, Right care, Right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Dean Park demonstrated good practice across all areas of Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture. People received person-centred care and had good access to the community. People were supported by staff who knew them well. People were empowered to be in control of their care and support. Staff were exceptional at promoting people’s independence and choice.

People were supported to access healthcare services and people’s health needs were met. Leaders thought of creative ways of ensuring people did not experience any inequalities.

People were supported by kind and caring staff who knew them well and treated them with respect.

Staff were generally positive about the service. Staff felt they had received enough training and supervision. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding and how to escalate concerns. All staff told us they felt staffing levels were generally insufficient; however, new staff had recently been recruited and were waiting to start their employment. Agency staff were used to ensure staffing numbers remained at safe levels.

The service was exceptionally well led. Leaders were committed to ongoing research in the health and social care sector and were passionate about improving outcomes for people. Leaders worked with other services and positively contributed to research and marketing to facilitate this. Leaders were dedicated in ensuring people received high-quality, person-centred care, and this culture was rooted within the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Outstanding

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant service leadership was exceptional and distinctive. Leaders and the culture they created drove and improved high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Julie Perry
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 16 February 2022. Latest assessment published 1 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
01471926 (opens Companies House)

Optimal Living Ltd runs 3 services, all in the South West. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Optimal Living Ltd

  1. G
    The Laurel Good. Care home, Swindon
  2. –
    Revell Close Care Home Not yet rated. Care home, Swindon

Getting help from Swindon Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Dean Park provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Dean Park as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Dean Park have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Dean Park.
When was Dean Park last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Dean Park was published on 1 July 2026.
Who runs Dean Park?
Dean Park is run by Optimal Living Ltd. It runs 3 services, all in the South West.
What is Dean Park's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01793 496458
Address
24 Park Lane, Swindon, SN1 5EL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Laurel Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. O
    Kings Court Care Centre Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Princess Lodge Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Lindum House Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Bath Road Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Swindon

See all care homes in Central Swindon