Rated Care Homes

Skelton Court

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 17 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 33 of 39

    rated care homes in Redcar and Cleveland are rated Good, like this one.

Skelton Court: inspection record

Care home, 65 beds, Redcar and Cleveland

Rated Good in May 2025.

Skelton Court: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Jervaulx Road Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Greta Cottage Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Hazelgrove Court Care Home Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Strathallen Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Oaklands Manor Nursing Home Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Redcar and Cleveland

See all care homes in North Skelton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 May 2025 (assessment visit 21 March 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 01 April to 03 April 2025. This assessment was carried out in response to information of concern received about the service relating to care and treatment and staffing. We did not find evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from these concerns. This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. Skelton Court is a residential care home providing personal care to up to 65 older people, some of whom were living with dementia. At the time of the inspection there were 45 people living at the care home.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was unannounced and was carried out by 3 inspectors and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Prior to the assessment we reviewed information we had received about the service. We sought feedback from health and social care professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the assessment we spoke with 13 people who used the service and 5 relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with staff including the regional manager, registered manager, deputy managers, senior care workers, care workers, housekeeping and catering staff. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. We reviewed a range of records. This included people’s care and medicine records. We looked at staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service were reviewed.

People were protected from the risk of harm and abuse. Staff had received safeguarding training and were aware of their responsibility to report any concerns. Staff told us they felt able to raise any concerns they had and were confident these would be acted upon. Risks to people's personal safety had been assessed and plans were in place to minimise these risks.

Systems were in place for the safe storage, administration and disposal of medicines. Records showed people received their medicines as prescribed and in their preferred manner. The service worked with other health and social care professionals to ensure people access to healthcare services to maintain good health.

Appropriate systems were in place to protect people from the spread of infection. During the assessment we observed the home to be clean, tidy and odour free.

People, their relatives and staff spoke positively about how the service was managed. There was a positive culture within the service. Staff felt supported by the management team and were able to raise any issues or concerns they may have. Staff had received the necessary training to support them in their role. Quality assurance systems were in place to monitor the quality of service being delivered. Plans were in place to ensure improvements to the service were identified and appropriate actions taken. Information regarding safeguarding, accidents and incidents were reviewed to ensure were required lessons were learned. People and their relatives were encouraged to provide feedback on the service and complaints were dealt with in line with the provider's policy.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Antony Griffiths
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Anchor Hanover GroupBrand: Anchor
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
RS007843 (opens Companies House)

Anchor Hanover Group runs 131 services in England, 9 of them in the North East. 111 are rated Good or Outstanding, 18 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Anchor Hanover Group

  1. O
    Beech Hall Outstanding. Care home, Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. O
    St Anne's - Saltash Outstanding. Care home, Cornwall, South West
  3. O
    West Hall Outstanding. Care home, Surrey, South East
  4. G
    Anchor Integrated Care & Housing Village - Denham Garden Village Good. Home care, Buckinghamshire, South East

See all 131 services run by Anchor Hanover Group

Getting help from Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Skelton Court provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Skelton Court as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Skelton Court have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 65 beds at Skelton Court.
When was Skelton Court last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Skelton Court was published on 16 May 2025.
Who runs Skelton Court?
Skelton Court is run by Anchor Hanover Group. It runs 131 services in England, 9 of them in the North East.
What is Skelton Court's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 16 May 2025.

Contact

Address
Station Lane, Skelton-in-cleveland, Saltburn-by-the-sea, TS12 2LR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Jervaulx Road Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Greta Cottage Good, 1.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Hazelgrove Court Care Home Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away
  4. G
    Strathallen Good, 1.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Oaklands Manor Nursing Home Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Redcar and Cleveland

See all care homes in North Skelton