Greenbanks Care Home
- Care home
- 30 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Hampshire, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
6 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.
2 years
since the latest rating was published.
59 of 420
rated care homes in Hampshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Greenbanks Care Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in June 2024, up from Inadequate.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bramshott Grange (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Shannon Court (Good, 2.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Bramshott Grange Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Shannon Court Good, 2.5 miles away
- G Donec Mews Good, 2.6 miles away
- G Beechwood Good, 2.8 miles away
- G The Cedars Good, 2.8 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 June 2024 (assessment visit 18 March 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 26 March to 26 April 2024.
This assessment was carried out as the service was previously rated as inadequate and in special measures.
Overall, we looked at 17 quality statements in Safe and Well Led. Overall the service is rated as requires improvement.
During this assessment we found that improvements had now been made. We found that people were safeguarded, risks to people were safely managed and records used to monitor and review people’s care were fully completed and up to date. There were now safe and effective infection control processes which ensured people were protected from the risk of infection. Risks to the premises were now being safely managed and learning and improvement had taken place. There were now processes in place for safe and effective staffing and systems and processes were in place to allow people's safe transition into the home. There had been improvement in the culture and people were able to speak up and have their voices heard. The service employed a diverse workforce and there was now good collaboration with partnerships and communities. There had been some improvement in medicine optimisation.
- Safe Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
However, we found although there had been some improvement in the management of medicines, some information was not always available to support staff to administer regular but variable dose medicines. We found weaknesses with the controlled drugs (CD) records and whilst medicines optimisation audits had been undertaken by the provider, the audits had not identified our concerns with the controlled drugs (CD) storage and records. We also found the provider had not requested a reference from previous employment where the person had worked in care. This was an isolated incident and the provider had sourced a professional and character reference for the staff member. The provider took steps and requested the reference immediately when notified.
We found 3 breaches in relation to good governance.
-
Safe
Good
We reviewed 8 quality statements for this key question.
We found staff now had good knowledge of how to manage risk. Staff could now demonstrate how they understood their responsibilities to keep people safe from avoidable harm and abuse. They had now received the relevant training in relation to their roles and responded promptly to people’s needs. During our observations, we witnessed staff talking to people appropriately and sought consent before supporting people. People, relatives and staff were able to raise concerns about the service and were confident that concerns would be dealt with. There was evidence of lessons learned from safety incidents and complaints. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs and staff were supported through regular supervisions or team meetings. Professionals were now encouraged to feedback to the service and there were now safe systems and pathways in place for people moving into the home. There were systems and policies and procedures in place to keep people safe.
However, we found concerns around people’s medicines optimisation and safe and effective staffing which resulted in 2 breaches.
-
Well-led
Good
We reviewed 7 quality statements for this key question.
We found staff and leaders now demonstrated a positive, compassionate, listening culture. Leaders monitored and reviewed the progress against the delivery of the strategy. Staff and leaders had now been provided with appropriate training to be effective in their roles. There were now mechanisms in place to allow people, relatives and staff to speak up and have their voices heard. There were policies and procedures in place to support workforce equality, diversity and inclusion. Learning, improvement and innovation had now increased since the last inspection. There was now evidence of the provider liaising with various health professionals to ensure safe care and treatment for people living in the service.
There were now clear governance, management and accountability arrangements in place. However, we found that some of the audits completed by the provider were not effective and had not identified some of the concerns we found. This was in relation to medicines optimisation which resulted in a breach.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Filipa Barros
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)10 inspection reports, latest 14 July 2023. Latest assessment published 6 June 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Buckland Rest Homes Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05446057 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Hampshire County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Hampshire County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0300 555 1386, Monday, Wednesday and Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Tuesday 9.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Hampshire County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Greenbanks Care Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Greenbanks Care Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Greenbanks Care Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 30 beds at Greenbanks Care Home.
- When was Greenbanks Care Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Greenbanks Care Home was published on 6 June 2024.
- Who runs Greenbanks Care Home?
- Greenbanks Care Home is run by Buckland Rest Homes Limited.
- What is Greenbanks Care Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 6 June 2024.
Contact
- Phone
- 01428 727343
- Address
- 29 London Road, Liphook, GU30 7AP Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bramshott Grange (Good, 0.4 miles away) and Shannon Court (Good, 2.5 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Bramshott Grange Good, 0.4 miles away
- G Shannon Court Good, 2.5 miles away
- G Donec Mews Good, 2.6 miles away
- G Beechwood Good, 2.8 miles away
- G The Cedars Good, 2.8 miles away