Rated Care Homes

The Flowers Care Home Limited

I

Inadequate

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 8 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Inadequate.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 2 of 102

    rated care homes in Bradford are rated Inadequate, like this one.

The Flowers Care Home Limited: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, Bradford

Rated Inadequate in March 2026, down from Good.

The Flowers Care Home Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Beacon House (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Acacia Bank Care Home (Good, 0.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Beacon House Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Acacia Bank Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Cooper House Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. O
    Beckside Lodge Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Reevy Road Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Bradford

See all care homes in Buttershaw

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 March 2026 (assessment visit 7 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The dates of assessment were from 8 January 2026 to 29 January 2026, and we visited the service on 8, 12 and 13 January 2026. The Flowers Care Home is a residential care home providing support for younger and older people, including people living with dementia. At the time of our assessment there were 18 people living in the service. This assessment was initiated following intelligence from partners and professionals identifying emerging risks.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective Inadequate
  • Caring Inadequate
  • Responsive Inadequate
  • Well-led Inadequate
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service was inadequate across all areas, placing people at significant risk of harm and, in some cases, life-threatening danger. Fire safety failings and uncontrolled access to steep, unsupervised stairs created an immediate risk to life. People were not safeguarded from known risks of potential harm or abuse, and systems to identify, monitor and respond to safeguarding concerns were ineffective. Staffing levels were unsafe, with agency staff lacking knowledge of people’s needs. Infection control was poor, bedding and equipment were unclean, and essential maintenance and safety checks were incomplete or undocumented. Medicines were not consistently managed, and care plans contained contradictions and omissions.

People’s basic needs were not consistently met. People were left hungry, offered limited food choices, and did not always receive fortified or nutritious meals. Care was not person-centred, with little choice over routines, meals, or activities. Communication and cultural needs were often unmet, and residents cared for in bed had minimal meaningful interaction. People with mental health needs were admitted without assurance staff were trained or competent to support them safely.

Leadership and governance were ineffective. Audits were inaccurate, incidents were not consistently recorded or acted upon, and staff feared speaking up. The previous registered manager’s absence and lack of provider oversight left the service without competent leadership.

We raised all identified concerns with the provider, who failed to take any effective action to protect people’s safety. As a result, the Local Authority had to intervene directly, arranging meal provisions to ensure people were fed, deploying additional senior staff to support safe care, and we escalated our fire safety concerns to West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service. This lack of provider action placed people at ongoing and avoidable risk and demonstrates a complete failure of leadership and accountability.

The provider was in breach of 9 legal regulations in relation to person-centred care, dignity and privacy, safe care and treatment, safeguarding, nutrition and hydration, safe environments, good governance, staffing and fit and proper persons.

This service is being placed in special measures. The purpose of special measures is to ensure that services providing inadequate care make significant improvements. Special measures provide a framework within which we user our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and provide a timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of the care they provide.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, the way people’s medicines were managed safely, safeguarding people from potential abuse or harm, the safe management of the environment, staffing and fit and proper persons employed.

  2. Effective

    Inadequate

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in people’s care, support and outcomes.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to meeting people’s nutritional and hydration needs.

  3. Caring

    Inadequate

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant people were not treated with compassion and there were breaches of dignity; staff caring attitudes had significant shortfalls.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to promoting privacy and dignity for people.

  4. Responsive

    Inadequate

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant services were not planned or delivered in ways that met people’s needs.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to person-centred care.

  5. Well-led

    Inadequate

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to inadequate. This meant there were widespread and significant shortfalls in leadership. Leaders and the culture they created did not assure the delivery of high-quality care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 25 March 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Inadequate on 25 March 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Inadequate on 25 March 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Inadequate on 25 March 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 9 August 2023. Latest assessment published 25 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05822544 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Flowers Care Home Limited provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Flowers Care Home Limited as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Flowers Care Home Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at The Flowers Care Home Limited.
When was The Flowers Care Home Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Flowers Care Home Limited was published on 25 March 2026.
Who runs The Flowers Care Home Limited?
The Flowers Care Home Limited is run by The Flowers Care Home Limited.
What is The Flowers Care Home Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Inadequate, published on 25 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01274 575814
Address
3 Snape Drive, Horton Bank Top, Bradford, BD7 4LZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Beacon House (Good, 0.3 miles away) and Acacia Bank Care Home (Good, 0.4 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Beacon House Good, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
    Acacia Bank Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Cooper House Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  4. O
    Beckside Lodge Outstanding, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Reevy Road Care Home Good, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Bradford

See all care homes in Buttershaw