Rated Care Homes

Westroyd Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 9 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 116 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Westroyd Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 31 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Good in January 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Westroyd Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Willows Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. I
    Charnwood Oaks Nursing Home Inadequate, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Acorn Close Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Ash Tree Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    White Acres Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Shepshed

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 8 January 2026 (assessment visit 9 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection 18 to 21 November 2025. The inspection was prompted by a review of information we held about the provider.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Westroyd Care Home is a care home registered to provide personal care and accommodation for up to 31 people, with differing needs, including older people, people living with dementia, physical disability and mental health needs. At the time of the inspection, the service was supporting 30 people.

This is the first assessment for this service since it was registered with the new provider, Crown Care VI Limited on 12 December 2023.

Systems and processes were in place to support an inclusive and positive culture of learning and improvement. The providers audits had identified areas for development, which included improvements both to the quality and consistency of care records, including some medicine administration records.

Potential risks relating to people’s care were assessed. However, in some instances we found people’s care records provided inconsistent information as to how risks associated with dehydration and malnutrition were to be mitigated and managed. The senior management team and registered manager took action and improved this recording.

People who were at risk of dehydration and malnutrition were referred to health care professionals. Risk related to falls and mobility were assessed, and equipment was used to reduce them. Care records provided information as to people’s health care needs, including catheter care and diabetes, and the management of associated risks.

Medicine administration records were not always signed by staff to confirm prescribed creams and ointments had been applied. Guidance for staff on the application of creams to be used as and when required lacked detail. The senior management team provided assurance improvements would be made. People’s medicines were regularly reviewed by a health care professional. Medicines, including tablets and liquids were administered and signed for and medicines were managed and stored safely.

People were able to participate in activities within the service, although the scope of these was limited. There were limited opportunities for people to access the wider community unless supported to do so by family members. The registered manager acknowledged improvements were needed in this area and was actively looking to bring about change.

Leaders worked with people, their relatives, staff and external partners to support in the delivery of safe care. However, the timeliness of responses to concerns regarding the condition of the driveway continued to be an area of concern for many family members. All those we spoke with expressed confidence in the registered manager and management team, who they said were both approachable and accessible.

Processes were in place to facilitate and support people to live healthier lives through ongoing reviewing and monitoring of people’s needs. Timely referrals were made to health care professionals in response to changes in people’s needs.

An external health care professional told us, “The care provided is consistently responsive and compassionate. Staff genuinely care about their residents and have a strong understanding of their health needs.”

Where people lacked capacity to make informed decisions then best interest decisions were made and documented. People who lacked capacity to make informed decisions were represented by a paid person’s representative when authorised restrictions were imposed to ensure their rights were protected and upheld.

People’s personal care needs were met by sufficient staff, who had undergone a safe recruitment process, and who had the training and knowledge to enable them to meet their needs, which included people living with dementia.

The provider engaged external contractors to maintain safety systems and equipment. We found the service to be clean. Recent improvement had been made to the environment, which in some areas included, decoration, new furnishings and flooring.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service since it was registered under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service since it was registered under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this service since it was registered under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service since it was registered under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service since it was registered under the new provider. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 8 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Andrea Burke
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Crown Care VI LimitedBrand: Crown Care
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09121435 (opens Companies House)

Crown Care VI Limited runs 6 services in England, 1 of them in the East Midlands. 5 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Crown Care VI Limited

  1. G
    Astell Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Newcastle upon Tyne, North East
  2. G
    Holyrood House Care Home Good. Care home, Wakefield, Yorkshire and the Humber
  3. G
    Pennine Lodge Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Cumberland, North West
  4. G
    Sandringham Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, County Durham, North East

See all 6 services run by Crown Care VI Limited

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Westroyd Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Westroyd Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Westroyd Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 31 beds at Westroyd Care Home.
When was Westroyd Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Westroyd Care Home was published on 8 January 2026.
Who runs Westroyd Care Home?
Westroyd Care Home is run by Crown Care VI Limited. It runs 6 services in England, 1 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Westroyd Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 8 January 2026.

Contact

Address
Tickow Lane, Shepshed, Loughborough, LE12 9LY Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    The Willows Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. I
    Charnwood Oaks Nursing Home Inadequate, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Acorn Close Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Ash Tree Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. RI
    White Acres Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

See all care homes in Shepshed