Rated Care Homes

Hampton Manor

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 117 of 136

    rated care homes in County Durham are rated Good, like this one.

Hampton Manor: inspection record

Care home, 55 beds, County Durham

Rated Good in February 2026.

Hampton Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Abigail Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Brockwell Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Rosemount Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Greenways Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Benfield Hall Nursing Home Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in County Durham

See all care homes in Consett

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 February 2026 (assessment visit 15 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 22 October to 14 November 2025. Hampton Manor is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to older people, including those living with dementia. This assessment included all the quality statements under each of the 5 key questions.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was prompted in part by concerns reported to CQC about staffing levels, over reliance on agency staff, staff training and a lack of appropriate care for people with pressure damage. We did not find these concerns were substantiated.

We also conducted this assessment as the service was unrated. This was the first assessment of this service since it was first registered with CQC on 19 April 2024. Visits to the service took place on 22 and 27 October 2025.Staff were knowledgeable about people’s individual needs and risks and how to keep them safe. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs in a timely way. Systems and processes were in place to assess risks to people and ensure they were safeguarded from avoidable harm. Staff completed safeguarding training and knew how to raise concerns. The administration of medicines was mostly safe, but some records around ‘when required’ medicines and prescribed creams required improvement.

Staff were mostly recruited in a safe way, however records of Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks regarding barred list status required improvement. Records relating to agency staff also required minor improvements.

Staff followed safe infection prevention and control practices and used personal protective equipment (PPE) to help prevent the spread of infections. People and relatives told us the home was clean and well maintained.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives, and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Care was person-centred with staff supporting people to make choices, maintain independence and access healthcare services. Staff worked well together and promoted people to live healthier lives. Care plans were tailored to individual needs, although some lacked detail regarding personal care preferences.

Staff supported people in a compassionate and caring way and respected their decisions and choices. Staff supported people to take part in a range of activities to support their emotional, physical and social needs.

A staff member said, “Things have improved a lot in the last few months. You can go to the manager and deputy about anything and they will listen. The operations manager and owner are here often and are willing to help.”

Areas of minor improvement identified during this assessment were responded to either during the assessment or immediately afterwards. The provider and management team demonstrated their responsiveness to our feedback and a desire to continually improve the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kirsty Minchell
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11030072 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Durham County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hampton Manor provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Hampton Manor as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Hampton Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 55 beds at Hampton Manor.
When was Hampton Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hampton Manor was published on 26 February 2026.
Who runs Hampton Manor?
Hampton Manor is run by Arlington Care Group Limited.
What is Hampton Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
01207 423423
Address
Gloucester Road, Consett, DH8 7FA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Abigail Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Brockwell Court Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. G
    Rosemount Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. G
    Greenways Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Benfield Hall Nursing Home Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in County Durham

See all care homes in Consett