Rated Care Homes

Two Rivers

Care home, Barnet, 8 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Two Rivers: inspection record

Care home, 8 beds, Barnet

Rated Good in October 2026, up from Inadequate.

Two Rivers: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 5 times since 2017. Rated Good in 2017, 2019 and 2023, then Inadequate in 2023, then Good in October 2026.

Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good. The latest rating was published this month.

How it compares locally

  • One of 59 Good care homes in Barnet, out of 68 with a rating.
  • Smaller than 8 in 10 care homes in Barnet.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 October 2026 (assessment visit 5 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Assessment Date: From 26 August to 01 October 2026. This assessment was undertaken as a comprehensive assessment. The service was registered with CQC on 27 September 2024. This was the first assessment since the current provider, Filey Care and Support Ltd, was registered with CQC.

The service was rated inadequate (published 9 November 2023 and 25 July 2024) under the previous provider.

Read the full summary

Two Rivers is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for people with a learning disability, autistic people, people with mental health needs and people with physical support requirements. They were supporting 8 people at the time of the assessment.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The new provider for the service had made improvements. The service was clean, well maintained and homely. People were comfortable, well-presented and were observed engaging in meaningful activities. Staff interacted positively with people, promoted choice and supported people to maintain relationships, practise their cultural and religious beliefs and access their local community.

Care records were comprehensive, person-centred and regularly reviewed. Risk assessments, healthcare and support plans reflected people's needs and were informed by relevant healthcare professionals. Staff had knowledge about safeguarding, individual risks and people's communication and support needs. Medicines systems were robust and the registered manager used audits and competency checks to maintain oversight.

There was evidence of strengthened leadership and governance since the current provider took over the service. Managers and staff consistently described improvements in communication, staff support, accountability, care planning and quality assurance. Governance systems included audits, supervision, training oversight and service improvement planning. Evidence showed that issues identified through incidents and audits were appropriately addressed and used to make improvements.

Our observations, discussions with staff and managers, record reviews and relative feedback demonstrated that improvements had been embedded into practice. The provider had addressed previous concerns relating to governance, communication, staff oversight, care planning and safeguarding through strengthened leadership, improved quality assurance systems and more effective oversight of care delivery.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Two Rivers
Address100 Long Lane, London, N3 2HX
Phone020 8346 4236
Registered managerElochukwu Stanislaus Ezeoke
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Dementia
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Mental Health
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Two Rivers
ProviderFiley Care and Support Ltd
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number09291786 (opens Companies House)

Filey Care and Support Ltd runs 2 services in London. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Filey Care and Support Ltd

  1. RI
    Filey Care and Support LTD Home care, Enfield
    Requires improvement

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Dell Field Court Care home, 0.5 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    Walsingham Support - 49 Essex Park Care home, 0.6 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Fernbank Nursing Home Care home with nursing, 0.6 miles away
    Good
  4. RI
    Elm Park Lodge Care home, 0.7 miles away
    Requires improvement
  5. G
    Baytree Lodge Care home, 0.7 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Barnet

Getting help from London Borough of Barnet

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Two Rivers provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Two Rivers as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Two Rivers have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Two Rivers.
When was Two Rivers last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Two Rivers was published on 13 October 2026.
Who runs Two Rivers?
Two Rivers is run by Filey Care and Support Ltd. It runs 2 services in London.
What is Two Rivers's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 October 2026.