Rated Care Homes

The Grange

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in January 2026.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 77 of 89

    rated care homes in Northumberland are rated Good, like this one.

The Grange: inspection record

Care home, 27 beds, Northumberland

Rated Good in January 2026.

The Grange: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Abbeyfield House Good, 3.8 miles away
  2. G
    Hillcrest Good, 3.8 miles away
  3. G
    Beech Tree House Good, 3.8 miles away
  4. G
    Castleview Care Home Good, 3.8 miles away
  5. G
    Summerhill Good, 3.9 miles away

See all care homes in Northumberland

See all care homes in Alnwick

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 January 2026 (assessment visit 14 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The inspection was carried out between 20 October and 15 December 2025. On site inspection of the service was undertaken on 20 October and 21 October 2025.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Grange is a residential care home which provides personal care for up to 27 people, including older people, younger adults, people living with dementia and those with a sensory impairment or physical disability. There were 26 people using the service at the time of our inspection.

This is the first inspection of the service, which was registered with a new provider in September 2024. The service had last been inspected under the old provider in October 2018 and was rated good at that time. At this inspection we have rated the service as good.

The service had enough staff to support people who required personal care, although people told us weekends and nights still needed staffing issues reviewed. Appropriate checks had been undertaken to ensure staff had the right skills and backgrounds. Staff had received a range of training and supervision to allow them to support people, although the quality of documentation regarding supervisions and appraisals could be improved.

Medicines were managed effectively and safely. An electronic reporting system was used to minimise errors and omissions. Safeguarding events were recorded, and action taken to ensure the local authority and CQC were informed. People’s needs were assessed prior to them coming to live at the home and care plans were regularly reviewed and updated. People and relatives told us they were involved in reviews and care assessments. Care plans were detailed, although some, particularly around medical conditions, were auto generated by the electronic system and were not person centred. The registered manager and provider was introducing a new system to improve the quality of the care records.

Areas of the home had decoration updated and building work was ongoing to extend and develop the home. Safety issues related to these building works had been addressed. The home was clean and tidy, although domestic staffing was an area where recruitment had proved difficult. The laundry area was cramped and needed updating and redevelopment.

People were supported to have choice and control in their daily lives, as far as possible. Families and friends were able to visit at any time. People and relatives told us there were activities at the home, although felt these could be improved. There had been recent recruitment of an additional activities co-ordinator. We observed people actively engaged with staff in a range of activities and events during the assessment.

The registered manager had introduced a range of systems to monitor the quality of the service and review its effectiveness. Audits by senior managers took place, although were not robust. Staff said they were well supported by the registered manager and other senior staff and could raise concerns freely. The registered manager was actively trying to engage with the local community.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service registered under a new provider in September 2024. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    People were involved in care decisions and managing risk. There were sufficient trained and supportive staff to provide people with care. The provider understood the importance of safeguarding people from abuse. Medicines were managed safely. Aspects of the environment needed improving and cleanliness and infection control required further review. The home was clean and tidy, although laundry facilities were cramped and needed reviewing.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service registered under a new provider in September 2024. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

    People’s needs were assessed and reviewed to ensure the service could continue to support them. Care plans were detailed and included good information about how to support people, although medical care plans were often generic in nature. Staff worked together to support people to lead individual lives. Consent and permissions were sought although some areas needed to be reviewed and updated around relative having legal authority to make decisions.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service registered under a new provider in September 2024. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

    People and relatives told us staff were kind, supportive and helpful. Staff recognised and understood people’s individual needs and encouraged people to be independent. People and relatives told us they would like to engage in more community activities. Staff told us they were well supported by the registered manager and the wider organisation.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service registered under a new provider in September 2024. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

    Care plans had good detail and clear actions for staff to follow to support people, although lacked individual detail at times. The registered manager explained a new care planning system was being installed to address this issue. People and relatives felt staff and managers listened to them and acted on any concerns they may have. People felt more activities would be helpful, along with better access to the community.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service registered under a new provider in September 2024. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    The registered manager had instigated several changes and a range of improvements. Monitoring systems were in place, although the registered manager acknowledged there was still more work to do. Governance systems were in place and overseen by the registered manager. Senior managers in the organisation oversaw the running of the service, although their formal audit processes need to be improved. People, staff and professionals were all highly positive about the registered manager and the improvement they had brought about at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Charlotte Hardy
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15464388 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Northumberland County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Grange provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Grange as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Grange have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 27 beds at The Grange.
When was The Grange last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Grange was published on 20 January 2026.
Who runs The Grange?
The Grange is run by People First Care (Rennington) Ltd.
What is The Grange's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 January 2026.

Contact

Phone
01665 577344
Address
The Grange, 3 Church Road,, Rennington,, Alnwick, NE66 3RR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Abbeyfield House Good, 3.8 miles away
  2. G
    Hillcrest Good, 3.8 miles away
  3. G
    Beech Tree House Good, 3.8 miles away
  4. G
    Castleview Care Home Good, 3.8 miles away
  5. G
    Summerhill Good, 3.9 miles away

See all care homes in Northumberland

See all care homes in Alnwick