Sycamore Court
- Care home
- 43 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2024
- Brighton, Brighton and Hove, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
9 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2017, most recently Good in February 2025.
20 months
since the latest rating was published.
72 of 83
rated care homes in Brighton and Hove are rated Good, like this one.
Sycamore Court: inspection record
Rated Good in February 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Hazelgrove Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Swanborough House Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Grove Park Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Brighton & Hove City Council - Craven Vale Resource Centre Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Acorn House - Acorn Watford Limited Good, 0.9 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 17 February 2025 (assessment visit 31 January 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Sycamore Court is a residential care home providing nursing care and support for up to 40 people. People were living with a range of needs associated with the frailties of old age and some people were living with dementia or other mental health needs.
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This assessment took place from 17 December to the 20 December 2024. We carried out an on-site visit on 17 December 2024. At the time of this assessment there were 40 people living in the home. Due to a change in registration during the assessment process, we made the decision to undertake a remote assessment to enable the service to be rated.
The assessment was planned in response to concerns raised about the safety of people and the management of the service and governance systems. We did not identify any significant issues during this assessment and the service has remained Good, with minor areas identified for continued improvement.
People received safe care and staff managed risks safely, responsively and effectively. People and staff told us they would feel confident to raise any concerns and that these would be responded to by the management team. The provider had liaised with external health professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people. This had promoted safe transitions for people moving between different services. Staff and management knew people well and received an induction, training and support that enabled them to manage people’s health and social care effectively and in a responsive way. Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a positive and friendly culture in the service. People were encouraged to remain as independent as possible and there was a dedicated activity team that worked alongside the care team to promote mental and physical well-being. Systems were in place that allowed people, relatives and staff to speak up and have their voices heard. There were ongoing improvement plans to make further improvements to the home.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
People’s health and care needs were assessed to ensure the service could meet their needs. People were supported by staff who had received comprehensive and appropriate training. The staff worked alongside other health professionals to ensure people received the right care and treatment. All staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
People told us that staff were kind, and respectful, and encouraged them to be as independent in their daily lives.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
People felt their individual lifestyle choices were respected by staff and they felt confident that any concerns or complaints would be dealt with fairly and quickly.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has improved to good. This meant the service management and leadership was consistent.
The provider had a range of policies and procedures that guided staff on how to support and care for people in an effective, caring and responsive way. Which also promoted an open and positive culture that allowed the service to consistently learn and improve outcomes for people.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Lisa Blencowe
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- GCH (NEW OPCO 2) LimitedBrand: Gold Care Homes
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 15886011 (opens Companies House)
GCH (NEW OPCO 2) Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by GCH (NEW OPCO 2) Limited
- G Partridge House Nursing and Residential Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Brighton and Hove
Getting help from Brighton and Hove City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Brighton and Hove City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01273 29 55 55, Monday to Friday 9am to 1.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Brighton and Hove City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Sycamore Court provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Sycamore Court as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Sycamore Court have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 43 beds at Sycamore Court.
- When was Sycamore Court last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Sycamore Court was published on 17 February 2025.
- Who runs Sycamore Court?
- Sycamore Court is run by GCH (NEW OPCO 2) Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
- What is Sycamore Court's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 17 February 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01273 697331
- Address
- Fitzherbert Drive, Bear Road, Brighton, BN2 4DU Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Hazelgrove Nursing Home Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Swanborough House Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Grove Park Good, 0.7 miles away
- G Brighton & Hove City Council - Craven Vale Resource Centre Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Acorn House - Acorn Watford Limited Good, 0.9 miles away