Old Hastings House
- Care home
- 60 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2025
- Hastings, East Sussex, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
18 months
since the latest rating was published.
39 of 258
rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Old Hastings House: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in May 2025, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Evergreen (Good, 0.2 miles away) and St Marks (Good, 0.2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Evergreen Good, 0.2 miles away
- G St Marks Good, 0.2 miles away
- G 63 Collier Road Good, 0.2 miles away
- RI The Laurels Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Mountside Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 May 2025 (assessment visit 25 March 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We carried out this comprehensive assessment between 10 and 19 March 2025. The assessment was carried out partly due to a recent change in ownership of the service and partly due to concerns raised relating to safety. Old Hastings House is a residential care home providing accommodation to up to 59 people who require nursing and personal care. At the time of our assessment 49 people were living at the service. The service is registered to provide support to older people including people living with dementia. We found two breaches of legislation. One related to the safe care and treatment of people. One related to the governance of the service. People’s safety was not consistently considered. There were no records of lessons learned when people experienced falls, the numbers of falls at the service had not decreased in six months. Risk assessments relating to falls were incomplete and lacked advice for staff. Some risk assessments for example, for people living with epilepsy and people self-administering medicines were missing. There had been no staff refresher training in dementia, safeguarding or manual handling and no training at all in end of life support. Medicine errors had not been recorded and not all PRN (as required) medicines had protocols in place to advise staff about administration. The governance and overview of processes had lapsed. There had been no effective auditing processes in place for the past six months. Staff had not had supervision meetings enabling them to raise concerns and issues. Care plans and risk assessments had not been reviewed or updated. People’s weights had not been overseen resulting in gains and losses not being monitored and therefore putting people at risk. There were concerns about some aspects of maintenance of the service with parts of the service not having adequate hot water supplies. The new registered manager had only been in post a few days and acknowledged these shortfalls and planned to put things right and to prioritise people’s safety. However, this would take time to embed. People’s needs had been assessed prior to moving to the service. People were treated with kindness and dignity. Care provision was person centred.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed
this.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. -
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as
partners in their care.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. -
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 1 May 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 1 May 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sara Phillips
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Simicare Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 05582027 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from East Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 60 80 191, 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week (including bank holidays)
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Old Hastings House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Old Hastings House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Old Hastings House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 60 beds at Old Hastings House.
- When was Old Hastings House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Old Hastings House was published on 1 May 2025.
- Who runs Old Hastings House?
- Old Hastings House is run by Simicare Limited.
- What is Old Hastings House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 1 May 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01424 452642
- Address
- High Street, Hastings, TN34 3ET Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Evergreen (Good, 0.2 miles away) and St Marks (Good, 0.2 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Evergreen Good, 0.2 miles away
- G St Marks Good, 0.2 miles away
- G 63 Collier Road Good, 0.2 miles away
- RI The Laurels Care Centre Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- G Mountside Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away