Rated Care Homes

Hawthorne Nursing Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 37 of 249

    rated care homes in Nottinghamshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Hawthorne Nursing Home: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 36 beds, Nottinghamshire

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026.

Hawthorne Nursing Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Active Neuro Kingswood Nottingham (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Springfield Care Home (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. I
    Eden Lodge Residential Care Home Inadequate, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Winslow Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Active Neuro Kingswood Nottingham Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Springfield Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Shortwood House Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Hucknall

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 June 2026 (assessment visit 21 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of Hawthorne Nursing Home, a nursing home providing care for 25 people at the time of the inspection, many of whom were living with dementia and complex health needs. The inspection took place over two days on 24 February 2026 and 24 March 2026 was carried out following concerns being raised.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People were supported with a wide range of needs including dementia, mobility support, pressure care, end‑of‑life care, Parkinson’s disease and the administration of time‑critical medicines.

We identified concerns around safety and governance. Environmental risks were not consistently managed, including fire safety arrangements, damaged fixtures and equipment that could not be cleaned effectively. Actions from fire risk assessments had not all been completed. These issues increased risks to people’s safety.

Infection prevention and control practices were not consistently effective. We found poor cleaning of equipment and damaged items, such as pressure cushions and mattress covers, that could not be cleaned effectively. This placed people at increased risk of infection.

People’s care records were not always clear or consistent. Some care plans and risk assessments lacked sufficient detail or contained contradictory information. This meant staff did not always have clear guidance on how to manage risks or respond to changes in people’s needs.

Medicines were stored securely and audits were in place. However, medicines management was not consistently safe, including gaps in infection control practices during administration and incomplete guidance for some ‘as required’ medicines. This increased the risk of unsafe medicines practices.

The service had experienced several recent changes in management with a change in manager between the first and second day of inspection. While people and relatives spoke positively about the management team, quality assurance systems were not yet effective. Leaders had not identified or addressed all the risks found during this inspection, including those relating to the environment, infection control and care planning. During the recent disruptions in management, leaders had not always maintained effective oversight of the running of the service. Some improvements had been made between the 2 inspection days.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service under the current provider. This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service under the current provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service under the current provider. This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service under the current provider.

    This key question has been rated good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service under the current provider.

    This key question has been rated requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 19 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Vindhya Unni
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
15274132 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hawthorne Nursing Home provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Hawthorne Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Hawthorne Nursing Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Hawthorne Nursing Home.
When was Hawthorne Nursing Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hawthorne Nursing Home was published on 19 June 2026.
Who runs Hawthorne Nursing Home?
Hawthorne Nursing Home is run by Hawthorne Care Home Limited.
What is Hawthorne Nursing Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 19 June 2026.

Contact

Address
School Walk, Bestwood Village, Nottingham, NG6 8UU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Active Neuro Kingswood Nottingham (Good, 0.8 miles away) and Springfield Care Home (Good, 1 mile away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. I
    Eden Lodge Residential Care Home Inadequate, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Winslow Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Active Neuro Kingswood Nottingham Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Springfield Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Shortwood House Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Nottinghamshire

See all care homes in Hucknall