Averley Home
- Care home
- 5 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2025
- Kent, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
9 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
4 months
since the latest rating was published.
89 of 445
rated care homes in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Averley Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in June 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Island Residential Home (Good, 0.7 miles away) and 23 Oak Avenue (Good, 3.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G The Island Residential Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G 23 Oak Avenue Good, 3.6 miles away
- – Meadows Not yet rated, 3.7 miles away
- O Moordean Outstanding, 3.7 miles away
- RI Winchester House Requires improvement, 4.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 16 June 2026 (assessment visit 16 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
We carried out this assessment between 18 March and 15 April 2026. Averley Home, formerly known as Welcome Home, is a residential service providing support for up to 5 adults with a learning disability and/or autism. The service was previously registered under a different provider but has continued to be managed by the same registered manager. At the time of our assessment there were 5 people using the service.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
We undertook this assessment due to concerns we received about the environment, staffing levels and staff training. We found these concerns were substantiated. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
This is the first assessment for this service which was registered on 30 April 2025.
The provider had not always ensured that people were protected against risks to their health, the environment and in the management of medicines. Some people had epilepsy and required a monitor to be used by staff to alert them when they were having a seizure. However, not all staff were aware of the monitor so had not been using it to ensure their safety. The environment had not been regularly maintained. This resulted in the lack of maintenance and repairs of wheelchair ramps which enabled people to access their home and to exit quickly in the event of a fire. Staff had not always followed best practice for storing medicines nor managing people’s medicines when they went out for the day.
The provider had not always ensured that staff had received all the training necessary for their roles. This included how to safely support someone with a feeding tube. People’s opportunities to go out and attend physical activity recommended by health professionals were limited due to staffing levels. Discussion had started with the funding authority about how to address these shortfalls.
The provider had not always ensured effective monitoring of the quality of the service. They had not identified shortalls we found in staff training, medicines nor the assessments of risks. The provider had a range of procedures to monitor the quality of the service but had yet to put them all into practice. This included systems to assess if new staff were competent to be added to the permanent staff team and to learn lessons when things had not gone as well as they could have.
Staff had a good understanding of people’s communication, personal and health needs. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff involved those important to people and took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity. Staff provided information people could understand.
People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends.
The provider supported staff wellbeing and the management team were visible and supportive. helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment.
At this assessment we found the provider was in breach of 3 legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, staffing and good governance. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
This is the first assessment for this service under the new provider. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment and staffing.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
This is the first assessment for this service under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
This is the first assessment for this service under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
This is the first assessment for this service under the new provider. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
This is the first assessment for this service under the new provider. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The provider was in breach of the legal regulation relating to good governance.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 16 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 16 June 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Susan Holton
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Averley Qwara Healthcare Ltd
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 14190306 (opens Companies House)
Averley Qwara Healthcare Ltd runs 2 services, all in the South East. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.
Other services run by Averley Qwara Healthcare Ltd
- – Averley Qwara Healthcare Ltd Not yet rated. Home care, Kent
Getting help from Kent County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Kent County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 03000 41 61 61, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Kent County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Averley Home provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Averley Home as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Averley Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Averley Home.
- When was Averley Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Averley Home was published on 16 June 2026.
- Who runs Averley Home?
- Averley Home is run by Averley Qwara Healthcare Ltd. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
- What is Averley Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 16 June 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01795 483997
- Address
- Cliff View Gardens, Warden Bay, Sheerness, ME12 4NH Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: The Island Residential Home (Good, 0.7 miles away) and 23 Oak Avenue (Good, 3.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G The Island Residential Home Good, 0.7 miles away
- G 23 Oak Avenue Good, 3.6 miles away
- – Meadows Not yet rated, 3.7 miles away
- O Moordean Outstanding, 3.7 miles away
- RI Winchester House Requires improvement, 4.5 miles away