Rated Care Homes

Dauntsey House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 133 of 151

    rated care homes in Wiltshire are rated Good, like this one.

Dauntsey House: inspection record

Care home, 21 beds, Wiltshire

Rated Good in December 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Dauntsey House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Market Lavington Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  2. G
    Whistley Dene Good, 4.1 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Bradbury Manor Good, 5.1 miles away
  5. G

See all care homes in Wiltshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 December 2025 (assessment visit 29 October 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 4 November to 5 November 2025. The service is a care home providing support to older people, some of whom were living with dementia. This inspection was carried out in response to a rating of requires improvement at the last inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider now had effective systems to ensure medicines were managed safely and people received the medicines were prescribed. We identified minor shortfalls in the information recorded about the support some people needed to take medicines prescribed to be taken ‘as required’. This was addressed by the registered manager during the inspection.

The provider now had effective systems to manage risks to people and others as a result of people experiencing distress.

There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s needs and how to meet them. However, action was needed to ensure gaps in staff training were resolved.

People and relatives were involved in assessments of their needs. Assessments considered people’s communication, personal and health care needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity to consent. The service was clean, and staff followed good infection prevention and control measures.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity. They treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way.

People and their relatives were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information in ways people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. People were supported to plan for their future, including identifying any needs in relation to end of life care. However, action was needed to transfer information about end of life care into a specific care plan to ensure it was easily accessible for staff.

The provider now had effective systems to assess how the service was operating and plan improvements where needed. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rayna Read
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

9 inspection reports, latest 1 December 2022. Latest assessment published 1 December 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05697250 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Wiltshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Dauntsey House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Dauntsey House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Dauntsey House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 21 beds at Dauntsey House.
When was Dauntsey House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Dauntsey House was published on 1 December 2025.
Who runs Dauntsey House?
Dauntsey House is run by Dauntsey House Care Limited.
What is Dauntsey House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 December 2025.