Rated Care Homes

Greville House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2015, most recently Good in October 2026.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 184 of 245

    rated care homes in Birmingham are rated Good, like this one.

Greville House: inspection record

Care home, 25 beds, Birmingham

Rated Good in October 2026.

Greville House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Highcroft House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Homecroft Residential Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Mercia Grange Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
  4. –
    Rosewood House Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  5. RI
    Aston Court Care Home Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 1 October 2026 (assessment visit 21 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 11 August to 1 September 2026. Greville House is a residential home providing care and support for up to 25 older adults. At the time of the assessment 23 people were living at the home. We carried out the assessment due to the age of the previous rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People had positive experiences of living at Greville House. People received kind, compassionate and person-centred care from a stable staff team who knew them well and respected their dignity, preferences and independence. People and relatives consistently praised the staff, describing the home as welcoming and family-like. People were supported to maintain relationships, participate in activities that interested them and make choices about their daily lives.

People felt safe and relatives were confident that staff communicated with them when concerns arose. There were enough suitably recruited and trained staff to meet people’s needs, and staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities. People received their daily medicines from trained staff.

People’s health and wellbeing needs were assessed and monitored, with good access to healthcare professionals and strong links with the local GP practice. People enjoyed meals that reflected their preferences and dietary needs. Staff sought prompt support from healthcare professionals which had contributed to improved health outcomes for people.

People’s communication and accessibility needs were identified. People could give feedback, raise concerns and contribute with suggestions for improvement by attending regular resident’s meetings led by the management team.

The service was well managed and had an open, compassionate culture. Governance systems monitored the quality and safety of care, and the registered manager responded promptly when improvements were identified. However, we identified some areas where monitoring systems, oversight and records could be strengthened. This included concerns around some aspects of environmental safety, medicines management of ‘as required’ medications and ensuring records clearly demonstrated people's involvement in care planning and reviews. The registered manager responded promptly to the issues identified and took immediate action to address them.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Alexandra Aulton
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 9 August 2019. Latest assessment published 1 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Greville House Care Home LimitedBrand: Lalit Ambasana
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07686183 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Greville House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Greville House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Greville House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 25 beds at Greville House.
When was Greville House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Greville House was published on 1 October 2026.
Who runs Greville House?
Greville House is run by Greville House Care Home Limited.
What is Greville House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 1 October 2026.

Contact

Address
40 Streetly Lane, Sutton Coldfield, B74 4TU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Highcroft House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Homecroft Residential Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. –
    Mercia Grange Not yet rated, 0.7 miles away
  4. –
    Rosewood House Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  5. RI
    Aston Court Care Home Requires improvement, 1.4 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham