Rated Care Homes

Rathgar Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 89

    rated care homes in West Northamptonshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Rathgar Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 23 beds, West Northamptonshire

Rated Requires improvement in May 2026, down from Good.

Rathgar Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hillcrest 2 (Good, 0.1 miles away) and St Matthews Limited - The Avenue (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Hillcrest 2 Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Matthews Limited - The Avenue Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Squires Mews Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    St Albans Close Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  5. O
    Spinney Hill House Outstanding, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in West Northamptonshire

See all care homes in Kingsthorpe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 May 2026 (assessment visit 22 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 30 April 2026 – 19 May 2026.

Rathgar Care Home is a care home providing personal care for up to 23 older people and specialises in caring for people with dementia. The home is an extended and adapted detached house in a residential area. The accommodation is spread over two floors accessed by a lift and stairs. At the time of our assessment there were 20 people living at the home.

We visited the service on 30 April 2026, 1 May 2026, 7 May 2026 and 14 May 2026. We reviewed documents and had follow up contact with the provider until 15 May 2026. We finished the assessment on 19 May 2026.

This was a fully comprehensive assessment carried out due to the length of time since we last rated the service.

This assessment was conducted by one inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. We spoke with six people who live at the service, nine relatives, and thirteen staff including care, kitchen, domestic, activities, administration and the registered manager and nominated individual.

The provider delivered care within a service where there were clear strengths in the culture, staff commitment and aspects of day-to-day care delivery. People, relatives and external professionals consistently provided positive feedback about the caring nature of staff and the environment. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s needs in practice and worked collaboratively with healthcare professionals to support positive outcomes for people.

There was evidence of a positive and inclusive culture within the service. People were supported to maintain their independence, participate in meaningful activities, and were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff spoke passionately about their roles and demonstrated a commitment to providing person-centred care.

The feedback we received demonstrated that leaders were compassionate and inclusive. In relation to the registered manager people told us, “This [registered manager] is brilliant,” and, “[Manager] is lovely – you couldn’t get anyone better.” We received similar feedback in relation the nominated individual. A person told us, “On a Monday and a Thursday, [nominated individual] comes and sits with me and talks to me – [nominated individual] is nice”. The positive feedback was echoed by staff who told us, “[Nominated individual] is very involved – it is very good [they] are approachable,” and, “[Nominated individual] has a good bond with residents”.

Although we did not find evidence of harm to people, the provider had not consistently ensured that systems and processes were effective. Governance was not always robust and had not identified a number of the concerns we found during the assessment in relation to aspects of safety and oversight. The provider assured us they had reflected on our findings and told us the actions they were taking, and how they would sustain improvements for the future.

We identified a breach of regulation in relation to good governance. This service has been rated Requires Improvement overall. We have asked the provider to submit an action plan in response to the concerns identified during this assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has remained Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Good. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 29 May 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 29 May 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Jane Borland
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 18 February 2022. Latest assessment published 29 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10390506 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from West Northamptonshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rathgar Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rathgar Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rathgar Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 23 beds at Rathgar Care Home.
When was Rathgar Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rathgar Care Home was published on 29 May 2026.
Who runs Rathgar Care Home?
Rathgar Care Home is run by Rathgar Care Home Ltd.
What is Rathgar Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 29 May 2026.

Contact

Phone
01604 499003
Address
349 Kettering Road, Northampton, NN3 6QT Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Hillcrest 2 (Good, 0.1 miles away) and St Matthews Limited - The Avenue (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Hillcrest 2 Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    St Matthews Limited - The Avenue Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Squires Mews Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. –
    St Albans Close Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  5. O
    Spinney Hill House Outstanding, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in West Northamptonshire

See all care homes in Kingsthorpe