Rated Care Homes

Woodfield Care Home Limited

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 9 of 41

    rated care homes in Calderdale are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Woodfield Care Home Limited: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 36 beds, Calderdale

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, up from Inadequate.

Woodfield Care Home Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Angelcare Residential Living (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Kimberley House (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Angelcare Residential Living Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Fleetwood Heights Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Kimberley House Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. RI
    Eagle Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Westgarth Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Calderdale

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 July 2026 (assessment visit 1 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 8 to 23 June 2026. Woodfield Care Home Ltd is registered to provide accommodation and personal care to older people, some of whom are living with dementia, have a sensory impairment or a physical disability. The service provides care and support for up to 36 people. At the time of the assessment there were 23 people using the service. At our last assessment, published January 2026, the service was rated inadequate. The provider was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, good governance and staffing. We carried out this assessment to review actions taken by the provider following our last assessment, which covered all key questions and quality statements. We identified areas of improvement since the last assessment; however, there were some shortfalls identified in the areas of medication management, agency staff competencies, the recording of people’s weights, faulty call buzzers and falls mats, and notifications to the Care Quality Commission (CQC). These issues were raised with the senior leadership team who actioned the concerns immediately.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff were recruited safely and completed statutory and mandatory training, along with competencies. There were generally enough staff available to meet people’s needs; however, some staff told us they felt under pressure at times because of staffing levels. Staff knew people well and mainly felt supported by the provider. Our observations of the care provided were positive, and people and their relatives told us they were satisfied with the service. The service presented as clean and smelt fresh, with evidence of robust cleaning procedures in place to prevent the spread of infection. We were made aware of a recent outbreak of infectious illness which was referred to the local authority infection prevention and control team. The people affected were treated and isolated; however, the infection prevention and control team continued to monitor the service.

Governance systems were mainly effective in monitoring and improving the quality of the service, in relation to incident management, safeguarding, and risk assessments.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.

    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Adam Colbeck
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 6 April 2019. Latest assessment published 13 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Woodfield Care Home LimitedBrand: Advinia Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07805818 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Woodfield Care Home Limited provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Woodfield Care Home Limited as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Woodfield Care Home Limited have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 36 beds at Woodfield Care Home Limited.
When was Woodfield Care Home Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Woodfield Care Home Limited was published on 13 July 2026.
Who runs Woodfield Care Home Limited?
Woodfield Care Home Limited is run by Woodfield Care Home Limited.
What is Woodfield Care Home Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01422 377239
Address
1 Woodfield Drive, Greetland, Halifax, HX4 8NZ Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Angelcare Residential Living (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Kimberley House (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Angelcare Residential Living Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. RI
    Fleetwood Heights Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Kimberley House Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. RI
    Eagle Care Home Requires improvement, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Westgarth Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Calderdale