Rated Care Homes

Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 18 of 100

    rated care homes in North Northamptonshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 33 beds, North Northamptonshire

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026, down from Good.

Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cheaney Court Care Home (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Heather Holmes Care Home (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cheaney Court Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Heather Holmes Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    2 Windsor Avenue Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Rookery Cottage Good, 3.5 miles away
  5. G
    Peaker Park Care Village Good, 4.1 miles away

See all care homes in North Northamptonshire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 25 August 2026 (assessment visit 8 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We visited the site on 18 and 26 June 2026, and 6 July 2026. We reviewed evidence off site as part of the assessment, spoke with people, relatives and staff and had follow up contact with the provider before concluding the assessment on 17 July 2026.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This was a responsive assessment, following an increase of concerns being raised with us. We requested and reviewed further information in response to these concerns, from the provider, but were not assured that their actions mitigated risk to people.

The service is a residential care home, providing accommodation and personal care for up to 33 people. At the time of the assessment, they were caring for 29 people.

The provider had taken over the service in February 2025. They had implemented a home improvement plan and were working to this, however, they had not sought feedback from people or their relatives, or incorporated people’s experience and quality of life within this plan.

Some relatives and staff told us that they didn’t feel incidents or accidents were addressed appropriately to prevent recurrence and protect people from harm. Staff told us they weren’t confident speaking up, due to fear of repercussions.

We found that care plans and other documentation relating to people was not person centred and did not reflect their needs, wishes and preferences. This was reflected in the day to day care we observed whilst at the service. Some staff told us that risk assessments and care plans were basic and did not contain a lot of detail.

The provider, leaders and managers did not have adequate oversight of the service, so had not identified practice concerns and other issues we found during our assessment. The provider did not focus on quality assurance and often was not adhering to their own policies and procedures.

We observed some positive, kind and caring interactions between staff and people, and interactions that promoted people’s independence. However, we also observed poor practice from some staff who were not always enabling people to have choice and control over their care.

The provider had recently appointed a consultant to support service improvement. At the time of our assessment, the provider had started to take steps to ascertain people’s preferences and choices on day-to-day aspects. They shared their plans with us to incorporate people’s views and feedback into the direction of the service; however, this had not begun at the time of our assessment.

During our assessment, there were interim managers and leaders in place.

We found that the provider was in breach of two legal regulations. These related to treating people with kindness, compassion and dignity and good governance. We have requested an action plan in relation to treating people with kindness, compassion and dignity.

In instances where CQC have decided to take civic or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, risk management, infection prevention and control and medicines management.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to treating people with kindness, compassion and dignity.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    This means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.

    This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to oversight of the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 25 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 25 August 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 25 August 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 25 August 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 26 October 2022. Latest assessment published 25 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10701990 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from North Northamptonshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 33 beds at Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home.
When was Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home was published on 25 August 2026.
Who runs Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home?
Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home is run by Abraham Health Care Limited.
What is Glenkindie Lodge Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 25 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01536 762919
Address
27 Harborough Road, Desborough, Kettering, NN14 2QX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Cheaney Court Care Home (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Heather Holmes Care Home (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Cheaney Court Care Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Heather Holmes Care Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    2 Windsor Avenue Good, 0.7 miles away
  4. G
    Rookery Cottage Good, 3.5 miles away
  5. G
    Peaker Park Care Village Good, 4.1 miles away

See all care homes in North Northamptonshire