Rated Care Homes

The Bungalow

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 16 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 295 of 361

    rated care homes in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

The Bungalow: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Essex

Rated Good in June 2025.

The Bungalow: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Newlands Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    481 Ipswich Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Shaftesbury Treetops Good, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Mill Road House Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Welshwood Manor Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Fox Street

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 June 2025 (assessment visit 25 April 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 1 May to 13 May 2025.

This service is a residential care home providing support to people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of the inspection, 6 people were living in the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks to people’s health and safety. However, the provider’s processes for recording incidents and safeguarding information required further development to demonstrate how concerns were investigated and managed.

There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs. Staff knew people well and understood how they like to be supported. Staff ensured people’s medicines were safe and met their needs. However, the provider’s medicines administration checks were not always sufficiently detailed and this meant relevant information was not always recorded.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs.

Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people and took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. People received fair and equal care and staff worked to reduce health and care inequalities.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and were given the time and resources to try new ideas. Governance processes were in place to monitor the safety and quality of the service. However, these were not always implemented effectively. Managers were responsive to feedback and there was a culture of continuous improvement within the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Karon Bosher
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

3 inspection reports, latest 25 August 2018. Latest assessment published 10 June 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07952107 (opens Companies House)

Maison Care Ltd runs 4 services, all in the East of England. 4 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Maison Care Ltd

  1. G
    Avalon Good. Care home, Essex
  2. G
    Little Paddocks Good. Home care, Essex
  3. G
    Saresta and Serenade Good. Care home, Essex

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Bungalow provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Bungalow as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does The Bungalow have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at The Bungalow.
When was The Bungalow last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Bungalow was published on 10 June 2025.
Who runs The Bungalow?
The Bungalow is run by Maison Care Ltd. It runs 4 services, all in the East of England.
What is The Bungalow's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 June 2025.

Contact

Phone
01206 843661
Address
Plains Farm Close, Ardleigh, Colchester, CO7 7QU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Newlands Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    481 Ipswich Road Good, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Shaftesbury Treetops Good, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Mill Road House Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away
  5. RI
    Welshwood Manor Requires improvement, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Fox Street