Rated Care Homes

Green Gables Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 1 month

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 74 of 102

    rated care homes in Bradford are rated Good, like this one.

Green Gables Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 11 beds, Bradford

Rated Good in September 2026.

Green Gables Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Wykewood Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Springfield Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Reevy Road Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Beckly House Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Bradford

See all care homes in Low Moor

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 14 September 2026 (assessment visit 6 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Green Gables is a residential care home providing care to adults some of whom were living with dementia. It is registered to support up to 11 people. At the time of our assessment there were 10 people living at the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We carried out this assessment on 10 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

The provider had systems and processes in place to support people to receive safe, effective and person-centred care. Care records were generally detailed and reflected people's individual needs, preferences and routines. Risks to people were assessed and managed appropriately, and staff were provided with clear guidance to support people safely whilst promoting their independence.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. This was reflected in our observations throughout assessment. People were observed moving freely around the home, choosing where they wished to spend their time, whether they wanted to participate in activities and what they wanted to eat and drink. Relatives also told us people were supported to make choices about their daily lives and maintain the greatest possible level of independence.

The service provided a homely and welcoming environment which supported people's comfort, wellbeing and independence. People's bedrooms were personalised and appropriate equipment, environmental checks and safety arrangements were in place. Staff received the training, supervision and support required to carry out their roles and demonstrated a good understanding of people's needs and how these should be met.

The provider used recognised, person-centred approaches to support people's nutrition, hydration and future care needs. People's nutritional needs were well supported through detailed care planning, regular monitoring and tailored interventions where required. Staff understood how to identify and respond to risks associated with poor nutrition and hydration, and worked with people to promote good health and wellbeing. Staff were observant to changes in people's needs and took appropriate action when concerns arose.

A particular strength of the service was its culture. The registered manager and staff consistently promoted an ethos that Green Gables was people's home and that people should be treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Observations throughout the assessment demonstrated this approach was embedded in daily practice. People were supported by a consistent staff team who knew them well and understood their individual preferences, routines and support needs.

The provider also demonstrated a commitment to continuous improvement. Systems were in place to review practice, learn from feedback and drive service development. The provider engaged with external organisations and quality improvement initiatives and had implemented additional oversight through the use of external audits and staff champions.

Most governance systems were effective; however, some audit processes required strengthening. In particular, further development of medicines audits and oversight of repositioning records was required. The provider responded positively to feedback provided during the assessment and took immediate action to address the areas identified. We found no evidence people had come to harm as a result of these issues.

Overall, the assessment found a caring and person-centred service with a strong culture, committed leadership and a clear focus on providing people with high-quality care and support.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key questionasgood. At thisassessmentthe rating hasremainedasgood.This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Ian Helstrip
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, People with an eating disorder, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 19 February 2019. Latest assessment published 14 September 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
IHDF Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11016043 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Green Gables Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Green Gables Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Green Gables Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 11 beds at Green Gables Care Home.
When was Green Gables Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Green Gables Care Home was published on 14 September 2026.
Who runs Green Gables Care Home?
Green Gables Care Home is run by IHDF Limited.
What is Green Gables Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 14 September 2026.

Contact

Phone
01274 676231
Address
2 Woodside Road, Low Moor, Bradford, BD12 0TX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. G
    Wykewood Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Springfield Good, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Reevy Road Care Home Good, 1.5 miles away
  5. G
    Beckly House Good, 1.6 miles away

See all care homes in Bradford

See all care homes in Low Moor