Rated Care Homes

Rapid Review & Resettlement

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 23 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 56 of 71

    rated care homes in Manchester are rated Good, like this one.

Rapid Review & Resettlement: inspection record

Care home, 7 beds, Manchester

Rated Good in November 2024, up from Requires improvement.

Rapid Review & Resettlement: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rose Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. –
    Norwood Drive Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
  4. G
    Timperley Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. O
    Halecroft Grange Outstanding, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Manchester

See all care homes in Wythenshawe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 November 2024 (assessment visit 2 May 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We carried out an assessment of Rapid Review and Resettlement. This is a specialist service used by autistic people or people with a learning disability. The date of assessment was 9 September 2024 to 20 September 2024. The assessment included 2 site visits, telephone calls to relatives of people using the service, and seeking and receiving the views of additional staff members following our site visits via emailed questionnaires. The assessment was completed to follow up on enforcement action we took following our previous inspection in July 2023 and August 2023, when we identified issues relating to person centred care, safeguarding processes, governance and record keeping. The provider had made improvements and is no longer in breach of regulations. People received safe, person centred care which met their needs and wishes. The provider was adhering to safeguarding processes, and had reported any concerns to the required professional bodies. Overall, record keeping was detailed and accurate, with people’s care plans explaining how they wanted to be supported. The provider audited and assessed service provision each month, and had employed an external organisation to review and help improve governance processes. Overall medicines were managed safely, however, we did find one medicine which was out of date. Staff received sufficient training and support to provide safe and effective care. Enough staff were deployed to meet people’s needs and support them in line with their care plans. Accidents, incidents and complaints were managed appropriately. Systems and process were in place for involving people and/or their relatives in their care & support. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    People received safe care from staff who were well trained and supported by the provider. The environment had been adapted to meet people’s specific needs, with the provider addressing any maintenance issues promptly, to ensure people’s continued safety. Accidents, incidents and complaints were documented and reviewed appropriately, with actions created and lessons learned considered.

    Relatives told us staff had developed positive working relationships with the people they supported, which had resulted in good outcomes. As placements at the service were temporary, the provider had developed systems and processes to support people to transition safely and successfully onto their next placement.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Assessments were completed prior to admission to ensure the service was suitable and staff had the information needed to provide effective care and support. People’s support plans were focused around promoting quality of life, achieving goals and ensuring they remained in good health. People’s nutrition and hydration needs were met, with records kept, evidencing what people had consumed. Staff documented successful outcomes and shared these with people’s relatives.

    The provider had been proactive in seeking ways to improve people’s experiences, including the use of electronic equipment to reduce the need for physical observations, which people may have found obtrusive. People’s consent was sought, and they were encouraged to make decisions for themselves.

  3. Caring

    Good

    People were treated with dignity and respect by staff who were described as kind, caring and compassionate. Relatives described seeing a positive change in their loved one’s presentation since moving into the home. Clear guidance was in place to ensure staff knew how people wanted to be supported and how best to communicate with them.

    People were supported to regularly access the community, to complete social and educational activities of their choosing. The provider ensured the environment, fixtures and fittings were adapted to meet people’s needs and minimise any restrictions.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    People received person centred care and were supported to complete activities and interests of their choosing. Staff supported goal setting and achievement and were mindful of the importance of ensuring people lived rich and fulfilled lives. Information was provided to people in a way they could understand.

    People and their relatives views were sought regularly, and they were encouraged to get more involved in the service and how it was run. Staff received training to ensure equality, diversity and people’s protected characteristics were respected.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    A new audit and governance process was being used to assess the quality and safety of the service and care provided. Action plans were generated and reviewed to ensure required improvements had been made. The provider had sought assistance from stakeholders and professional organisations to help drive improvements.

    Relatives of people living at the location were complimentary about how the service was run and had found management to be open and approachable. People, relatives and staff ‘s views were regularly sought, and staff told us they felt confident in speaking up and reporting any issues.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Paul Smith
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 22 November 2023. Latest assessment published 5 November 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Zeno Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05398712 (opens Companies House)

Zeno Limited runs 2 services, all in the North West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Zeno Limited

  1. –
    Zeno Limited No overall rating. Home care, Stockport

Getting help from Manchester City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Rapid Review & Resettlement provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rapid Review & Resettlement as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Rapid Review & Resettlement have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 7 beds at Rapid Review & Resettlement.
When was Rapid Review & Resettlement last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rapid Review & Resettlement was published on 5 November 2024.
Who runs Rapid Review & Resettlement?
Rapid Review & Resettlement is run by Zeno Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the North West.
What is Rapid Review & Resettlement's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 November 2024.

Contact

Address
12 Newall Road, Newall Green Farm, Manchester, M23 2TX Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Rose Lodge Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. –
    Norwood Drive Not yet rated, 0.8 miles away
  3. RI
  4. G
    Timperley Care Home Good, 1.2 miles away
  5. O
    Halecroft Grange Outstanding, 1.3 miles away

See all care homes in Manchester

See all care homes in Wythenshawe