Rated Care Homes

Hazel Homes for Autism

Care home, Sutton, 5 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Hazel Homes for Autism: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Sutton

Rated Good in March 2026.

Hazel Homes for Autism: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 2 times since 2019. Rated Good in 2019 and March 2026.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2019. The latest rating was published 7 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 58 Good care homes in Sutton, out of 63 with a rating.
  • Smaller than 9 in 10 care homes in Sutton.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 31 March 2026 (assessment visit 25 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

This assessment took place between 10 March and 20 March 2026. Hazel Homes for Autism is a care home providing personal care to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. At the time of our assessment there were 4 people using the service.

We assessed the service against ‘right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Read the full summary

People were protected and kept safe. On the whole, risks to people were managed effectively. However, improvements were needed in management oversight of gas safety inspections at the service. Plans were already in place to address this.

Staff received appropriate training and support to develop in their roles and deliver effective care. There were enough staff to meet people’s needs, and they worked well with each and others involved in people’s care. Recruitment processes were robust, ensuring only suitable staff were employed. Infection risks were well managed.

People were involved in assessing their needs and received person-centred care, which was reviewed with them to ensure it remained appropriate. Staff supported people to stay healthy and well. People received their medicines when they needed them. Staff supported people to understand their care so they could give informed consent.

People were supported to have choice and control over their care and support and to maintain their independence. Information was provided in ways that reflected people’s needs and preferences. People were treated fairly and supported to access care and services when needed. Staff understood people’s rights and how to uphold them.

The service was led by managers who understood people’s needs and promoted an open culture where concerns could be raised and addressed. Staff were supported with their wellbeing. Governance systems helped identify shortfalls and drive improvement at the service. Managers fostered a culture of learning, inclusion and partnership working focused on achieving positive outcomes for people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment, we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Hazel Homes for Autism
Address1 Miller Close, Mitcham, CR4 4AX
NeighbourhoodSt Helier, Sutton
Phone020 3754 2794
Registered managerKamiludeen Onayemi
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 1 inspection report, latest 30 October 2019 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 31 March 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Hazel Homes for Autism
ProviderHazel Homes For Autism Ltd
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number11075812 (opens Companies House)

Hazel Homes For Autism Ltd runs 2 services in London. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Hazel Homes For Autism Ltd

  1. –
    The Old Manse Care home, Bromley
    Not yet rated

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    McRae Lane Care home, less than 0.1 miles away
    Good
  2. G Good
  3. G
    Fieldway Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.9 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Rosebank Lodge Care home, 1 mile away
    Good
  5. G
    Acorn Residential Home Care home, 1 mile away
    Good

See all care homes in Sutton

Getting help from London Borough of Sutton

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Hazel Homes for Autism provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Hazel Homes for Autism as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Hazel Homes for Autism have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Hazel Homes for Autism.
When was Hazel Homes for Autism last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Hazel Homes for Autism was published on 31 March 2026.
Who runs Hazel Homes for Autism?
Hazel Homes for Autism is run by Hazel Homes For Autism Ltd. It runs 2 services in London.
What is Hazel Homes for Autism's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 31 March 2026.