Rated Care Homes

Jane House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • 5 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 87 of 107

    rated care homes in Sheffield are rated Good, like this one.

Jane House: inspection record

Care home, 5 beds, Sheffield

Rated Good in May 2026.

Jane House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Ascot Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Richmond Heights Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    Berners Road Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Kirkby View Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Step Up Support Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Handsworth

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 15 May 2026 (assessment visit 4 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 13 April to 7 May 2026. Jane House is a residential care home providing personal care and support to adults with learning disabilities and/or autistic people. At the time of this assessment there were 5 people living in the service. We assessed the service because of the age of the rating and the length of time since our last assessment. As part of this assessment of the service, we reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The outcome of this assessment was a rating for the service. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities most people take for granted. We were assured the service provided care in line with this guidance.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Accidents and incidents were analysed but not frequently enough to identify current trends and patterns. We discussed this with the registered manager, and they took action to make improvements. The provider made appropriate referrals to the local authority to keep people safe. We discussed submitting notifications to CQC at the same time these referrals were made and the registered manager identified improvements to their reporting processes. People’s care plans were personalised and care and support was delivered in line with these care plans. The provider had appropriate and detailed risk assessments in place which identified the numbers of staff required to support people throughout the day. Risk assessments were reviewed regularly which ensured the appropriate staffing levels where in place. Medication administration was managed safely and people received their medications as prescribed.

The provider planned and delivered people’s care and treatment with them, including what was important and mattered to them. Members of staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. People’s capacity to consent to care was assessed and recorded in their care plans. Assessments were decision-specific in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice.

The provider always treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. People were supported to make choices about their day to day living and support. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to always deliver person-centred care.

Care was person-centred and each person's unique identity was supported and maintained. People received care and support from a consistent team of staff who knew them well. This ensured continuity of care and support. Members of staff involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. The service provided equitable care and support which ensured people, regardless of their communication abilities or complexity of needs, received personalised, respectful and consistent care. People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty. The registered manager was well organised and they empowered the staff team to lead and manage the care home. Our discussions with the registered manage and provider identified some areas for improvement around submission of notifications to CQC and analysis of accidents and incidents. The changes and improvements needed to be sustained and embedded into practice. The service had a clear system of audits and reviews which were completed regularly by a member of the management team. The provider understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people. People were supported to access local shops and specialist services in the community.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kathryn Brandon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 20 January 2022. Latest assessment published 15 May 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08133057 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Sheffield City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Jane House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Jane House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Jane House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 5 beds at Jane House.
When was Jane House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Jane House was published on 15 May 2026.
Who runs Jane House?
Jane House is run by Jane House Limited.
What is Jane House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 15 May 2026.

Contact

Address
2 Corker Road, Sheffield, S12 2TH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Ascot Lodge Nursing Home Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Richmond Heights Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. –
    Berners Road Not yet rated, 0.5 miles away
  4. G
    Kirkby View Good, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Step Up Support Good, 0.6 miles away

See all care homes in Sheffield

See all care homes in Handsworth