Rated Care Homes

Bridge House

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 8 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 12 of 111

    rated care homes in Oxfordshire are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Bridge House: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 71 beds, Oxfordshire

Rated Outstanding in January 2019, up from Good.

Bridge House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    OSJCT Old Station House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Leafield Residential Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. –
    Abingdon Court Care Home Not yet rated, 1 mile away
  4. –
    Stowford House Care Home Not yet rated, 1.2 miles away
  5. O
    Oxford Beaumont Outstanding, 3 miles away

See all care homes in Oxfordshire

See all care homes in Abingdon-on-Thames

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 18 January 2019. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We inspected this service on 22 and 23 November 2018. This was an unannounced inspection. Bridge House nursing home is registered to provide accommodation for up to 71 older people and prepared to accommodate individuals living with dementia and require personal or nursing care. At the time of the inspection there were 70 people living at the service.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Bridge House is a 'care home.' People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. The CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, both of which we looked at during this inspection.

At the last inspection on 18 April 2016, the service was rated good. At this inspection, we found the service had improved to outstanding.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service was exceptionally well-led. All staff showed a passion and commitment to providing the best support to enable people to have full lives. The management team and staff shared common values about the aims and objectives of the service. These were based on people being supported to live full and enjoyable lives and engaging with the community they lived in to reduce social isolation. Regular quality audits and checks were completed so improvements were continually recognised and there was effective follow up action which made sure people received a high-quality service.

People at Bridge house received exceptional person-centred care and support. The management and staff team understood what was important to people living at the home and acted upon this to improve people's quality of life. Management and staff worked closely and with people and their families to ensure each person lived as good a life as possible. People played an active part in the running and development of the home. A motivated management and staff team came up with new ideas to enhance people's quality of life and provide benefit to people.

People were supported to retain an active presence in the local community and to maintain their personal interests and hobbies. An activities team alongside care staff all worked together to organise an imaginative and rich programme, providing every opportunity for people to take part in activities that were meaningful. People had opportunities to maintain and develop relationships with visitors to widen their social networks. There was a sense this was people's home which people were proud of. People were supported to actively use their skills and interests in the decoration of the different spaces within their home environment.

Food and drink were provided to a high standard and people could choose what to eat and drink, as well as

decide on times of their meals. People who lived at the home and their relatives could voice their views and opinions. The registered manager listened to what people had to say and took action to resolve any issues. The management team reviewed incidents and concerns to look for opportunities to improve policies and practices for the future. There were systems in place for handling and resolving complaints which focused upon opportunities for learning lessons.

People who lived at the home and all staff were actively encouraged to contribute to the evaluation of the care and support provided and make recommendations for improvement. The management team and staff worked together as a team with a passion to learn about and aim for best practice, with people very much at the heart of the services they received in their home.

People were supported to make safe choices in relation to taking risks in their day to day lives, which helped people to maintain their own levels of independence. This was because staff made sure people had the equipment and aids they required to meet their needs. Staff had been suitably trained and understood how to support people in a way which protected them from harm and abuse. People benefited from positive risk taking which improved their morale and quality of life.

Staff received regular training which provided them with the knowledge and skills to meet people's needs in an effective, responsive and personalised way. The management team supported staff to gain additional knowledge to promote a greater awareness and understanding of the diverse needs of people whom they provided with care and support. Staff had used their knowledge in practice on many occasions to support people in gaining additional equipment, aids and specialist advice which had a significant impact on enhancing people's well-being.

The service worked in partnership with other health care organisations, local school and a local hospice. The registered manager provided free of charge training for other health care providers and pioneered a toddler group that was interacting with people living in the home.

The five questions we ask about services and what we found

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Anita Radecka
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 18 January 2019. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Bridge House (Oxfordshire) LimitedBrand: Carebase
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07393663 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Oxfordshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bridge House provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Bridge House as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Bridge House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 71 beds at Bridge House.
When was Bridge House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bridge House was published on 18 January 2019.
Who runs Bridge House?
Bridge House is run by Bridge House (Oxfordshire) Limited.
What is Bridge House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 18 January 2019.