Rated Care Homes

Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in November 2025.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 7 of 48

    rated care homes in Bath and North East Somerset are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre: inspection record

Care home, 46 beds, Bath and North East Somerset

Rated Requires improvement in November 2025.

Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ashley Phoenix Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Watery Lane Cottage (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Ashley Phoenix Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Gallaudet Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Watery Lane Cottage Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    29 & 30 Dominion Road Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    Dimensions Newton House Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Bath and North East Somerset

See all care homes in Englishcombe

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 November 2025 (assessment visit 8 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Assessment activity started on 17 July 2025 and finished 2 October 2025. This was a responsive focused inspection to follow up concerns in safe and well led plus checking on previous concerns.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We found 1 breach in regulation around managing risks to people. The service was no longer in breach of the regulation for governance because systems had improved enough.

The provider still did not always work effectively with people to manage risks and provide clear guidance. Care plans contained inconsistencies and lacked details for specific clinical tasks, leading to potential risks to people. Staff lacked training and guidance to ensure consistent and safe care.

The provider did not always ensure there were enough qualified, skilled, and experienced staff. Training and support for staff were inconsistent, leading to potential risks in care delivery. However, there were enough staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe.

The provider did not always have clear responsibilities, roles, or systems of accountability. Actions identified as necessary were not always managed in a timely manner. External and internal audits were conducted, although changes were not always implemented promptly. Following the transfer into the local authority, new systems have been put in place and in some cases slowed down changes and learning.

The provider maintained a proactive and positive culture of safety, characterised by openness and honesty. Staff were encouraged to raise concerns about safety, and these were investigated and addressed promptly.

Lessons learned from safety events were shared and embedded into practice to continually improve safety standards.

The provider collaborated with people and healthcare partners to establish and maintain safe systems of care. This included ensuring continuity of care during transitions between services.

The provider worked with people and healthcare partners to understand what being safe meant to them and how best to achieve it. Staff focused on improving people's lives while protecting their right to live free from abuse and neglect. Concerns were shared quickly and appropriately.

The home was well-maintained, and systems were in place to manage the environment safely. People were kept safe in the event of a fire. The provider assessed and managed the risk of infection effectively. The home was clean, and staff were aware of infection prevention measures. However, there were occasional discrepancies in cleaning records.

People were supported by safe medicine management. The management engaged people and staff in decision-making and promoted diversity and human rights.

The provider had inclusive leaders who understood the context of care delivery and embodied the organisation's culture and values. Leaders demonstrated integrity, openness, and honesty throughout the inspection.

The provider fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and be heard. Staff felt confident raising concerns, although there were occasional lapses in communication up the management chain.

The provider valued diversity and worked towards an inclusive and fair culture. Systems were in place to ensure staff were treated fairly, and there was a focus on equity. Managers were quick to apologise and accept responsibility for errors.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The service was still in breach of legal regulation in relation to assessing and mitigating risks to people.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – At this inspection we only looked at consent to care and treatment because no other areas of concern were identified.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 26 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 26 November 2025. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Julia Archer
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 2 February 2023. Latest assessment published 26 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation

Bath and North East Somerset Council runs 2 services, all in the South West. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Bath and North East Somerset Council

  1. G
    Combe Lea Community Resource Centre Good. Care home, Bath and North East Somerset

Getting help from Bath and North East Somerset Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 46 beds at Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre.
When was Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre was published on 26 November 2025.
Who runs Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre?
Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre is run by Bath and North East Somerset Council. It runs 2 services, all in the South West.
What is Cleeve Court Community Resource Centre's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 26 November 2025.

Contact

Phone
01225 396788
Address
Cleeve Court, Cleeve Green, Twerton,, Bath, BA2 1RS Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Ashley Phoenix Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Watery Lane Cottage (Good, 0.1 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Ashley Phoenix Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Gallaudet Home Requires improvement, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Watery Lane Cottage Good, 0.1 miles away
  4. G
    29 & 30 Dominion Road Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. G
    Dimensions Newton House Good, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Bath and North East Somerset

See all care homes in Englishcombe