Rated Care Homes

The Service Tree Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2016.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 86 of 114

    rated home care services in Nottinghamshire are rated Good, like this one.

The Service Tree Limited: inspection record

Home care, Nottinghamshire

Rated Good in October 2026.

The Service Tree Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Respectful Care Nottingham South Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    WeCare Angels I Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    RoseLea House Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Forever Independent Good, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

See all home care services in West Bridgford

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 October 2026 (assessment visit 2 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The Service Tree Limited is a home care service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of this assessment, 33 people were using the service; however, only 25 were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

The service provided care and support to people of all ages, including those living with mental health conditions and dementia, in their own homes.

We carried out this assessment 14 to 16 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People received person-centred care and were supported by a staff team who knew them well. People's care was monitored regularly to ensure it continued to meet their needs. Care plans were reviewed and updated as required, reflecting changes in people's preferences, circumstances, and support requirements.

The service was well-led by experienced and knowledgeable managers. Who were compassionate, knew people well and ensured care and support was safe and effective for people. All staff spoke positively regarding the management team. Comments were, “[name] and [name] are very good leaders, they are approachable about anything. It's a lovely place to work. We are all like family and we like to help our clients and each other.” “[name] and [name] are very much approachable and the best managers one could ask for.”

Care and support were delivered in line with best practice guidance. Risks were assessed, and people were involved in the process. Risk assessments were regularly reviewed and updated to reflect people's changing needs and circumstances. One professional told us, “The Service Tree routinely seeks relevant information regarding a person's diagnosis, medication requirements, continence needs, dietary preferences, communication abilities, and any other factors necessary to provide safe and appropriate support. This proactive approach ensures that care is tailored to the individual's needs and promotes positive outcomes.”

Incidents and accidents were recorded and reviewed by the management team. Records showed action had been taken to prevent similar incidents from recurring.

There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding procedures and knew what action to take if they suspected abuse or had concerns about a person's safety. One staff member said, “I know how to recognise abuse, in some cases the person acts strange, they [person] have unexplained injuries. In such circumstances I would report it immediately to the company’s designated safeguarding lead, write down a report with the exact words of the service user, and record the time as well.”

Staff had been recruited safely. People were supported by enough staff who had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Staff told us they had completed a detailed induction. One staff member said. “I had an induction at The Service Tree office. I was taught about company policies, completed the Care Certificate and did shadowing for 2 weeks. I also went to the Tuesday Social that is held by the company where I got to meet most of the clients.”

Medicines were administered safely, and systems were in place to help ensure a safe environment. For example, the provider had completed an environmental risk assessment and ensured staff were aware of the locations of gas, water, and electricity shut-off points in the event of an emergency. This helped staff respond promptly and appropriately to any risks affecting people.

People were involved in all aspects of their care. They were supported to remain independent and were provided with choice and control over how they wished to be supported. The provider arranged a social group, this was an invite to all the people they supported to meet up once a week to have social interaction with each other and the staff team. One professional told us, “I have worked in partnership with The Service Tree for several years, supporting and escorting patients to their day social group on Tuesdays. Throughout this time, I have consistently observed a high standard of person-centred care delivered by [manager] and, [manager], and the wider team. They go above and beyond to ensure that every individual feels welcomed, valued, and included.”

Systems were in place to listen to people and gather their views about the service. People could provide informal feedback, and quality assurance surveys were sent to people and staff. The feedback received was reviewed and analysed to help drive improvements and ensure the service continued to meet people's needs.

There were effective governance and management systems in place. Auditing systems were used, and regular audits were completed to enable the management team to maintain oversight of the service and identify areas for improvement. Spot checks were undertaken to ensure care was delivered in line with the provider's values and vision, and that people received safe, high-quality care. Findings from audits, spot checks, and quality assurance questionnaires were used to drive continuous improvement and address any issues identified.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Lucy Bolt
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 17 January 2019. Latest assessment published 12 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08310335 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Nottinghamshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does The Service Tree Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for The Service Tree Limited.
When was The Service Tree Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Service Tree Limited was published on 12 October 2026.
Who runs The Service Tree Limited?
The Service Tree Limited is run by The Service Tree Limited.
What is The Service Tree Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 October 2026.

Contact

Address
16a Gordon Road, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 5LN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Respectful Care Nottingham South Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    WeCare Angels I Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    RoseLea House Outstanding, 0.5 miles away
  5. G
    Forever Independent Good, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Nottinghamshire

See all home care services in West Bridgford