Rated Care Homes

Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in March 2020.

  • 7 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 41 of 51

    rated home care services in South Gloucestershire are rated Good, like this one.

Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury: inspection record

Home care, South Gloucestershire

Rated Good in March 2020.

Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. O
    Bluebird Care (South Gloucestershire) Outstanding, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    YourLife (Chipping Sodbury) Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Helping Hands Chipping Sodbury Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. O
    Cambrian Green Court Outstanding, 1.2 miles away
  5. G
    Care Horizons Limited Good, 1.6 miles away

See all home care services in South Gloucestershire

See all home care services in Yate

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 26 March 2020. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service: Network Health Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency. At the time of the inspection they were providing personal care to 163 people in their own homes.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People's experience of using this service:

People told us they felt safe and that staff were kind, supported them in a dignified and respectful manner and maintained their privacy and independence.

Relatives were positive about how safe their family members were. Medicines were administered and managed safely.

The management strove to be open and continually develop and improve the support people were receiving. They were aware of their responsibility to notify the Care Quality Commission of certain events in line with their statutory obligations.

People were supported by staff who had received a range of training including specialist training in health and social care.

Staff knew people well and relatives felt reassured their family members were well cared for. Care plans and the nature of the support being provided were person centred. However we also found that risk assessments were not always completed in full so that there was a clear overall picture of the risks associated with a person's care.

The provider was not always meeting the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 as they obtained signatures from relatives on behalf of people who had been assessed and determined were able to consent to their care by themselves .

Communication with health and social care professionals was effective in ensuring people received joined up care. The provider had aims and standards for the service and told people what they should expect from staff and the service in respect of the quality of care they received.

The provider worked in partnership with other agencies. This supported people in ensuring any changes were raised with professionals and those funding the person's care needs.

Rating at last inspection: The service was rated good at our last inspection (published 5 July 2017).

Questions to ask the service

  1. The last rating is 7 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  3. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

4 inspection reports, latest 26 March 2020. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04079081 (opens Companies House)

Network Healthcare Professionals Limited runs 10 services in England, 9 of them in the South West. 7 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Network Healthcare Professionals Limited

  1. G
    Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Liverpool Good. Home care, Liverpool, North West
  2. G
  3. G
  4. G

See all 10 services run by Network Healthcare Professionals Limited

Getting help from South Gloucestershire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury.
When was Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury was published on 26 March 2020.
Who runs Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury?
Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury is run by Network Healthcare Professionals Limited. It runs 10 services in England, 9 of them in the South West.
What is Network Healthcare Professionals Limited - Chipping Sodbury's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 March 2020.